Airworthiness Directives 2004
I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil
Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:
(a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in
Schedule 1; and
(b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness
Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
20 December 2004
Note: Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the
same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.
Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of
Airworthiness Directives
Beechcraft 77 (Skipper) Series Aeroplanes
AD Name AD Number
Wing Attachment Bolts and Nutplates AD/BEECH 77/1
Rudder and Rudder Trim Tab AD/BEECH 77/2
Aileron Torque Tube Bearings AD/BEECH 77/3
Elevator Control Arm Bushings AD/BEECH 77/4
Control Column Installation AD/BEECH 77/5
Engine Mount Assembly to Firewall Attach Bolts AD/BEECH 77/6
Shoulder Harness Attach Bracket AD/BEECH 77/7 Amdt 1
Horizontal Stabiliser Attach Bolts AD/BEECH 77/8
Nose Landing Gear Axle AD/BEECH 77/9
Nose Landing Gear Attachment Bolts AD/BEECH 77/10
Wing - Inspection, Bolt Replacement and Fatigue Life Limitation AD/BEECH 77/11
Engine Mount Assembly and Engine Control Linkage AD/BEECH 77/12
Engine Control Rod Safety Washers AD/BEECH 77/13
Rudder Balance Weight AD/BEECH 77/14
Alternator System AD/BEECH 77/15 Amdt 1
Overview
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, enacted on 20 December 2004, represent an initiative by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure the ongoing safety and airworthiness of aircraft within Australia. The legislative instrument was developed under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically subregulation 39.001 (1), empowering the delegate of CASA, David Alan Villiers, to revoke existing directives and re-issue them in updated form. This move addresses the need to maintain current and effective safety standards in alignment with the latest technological and safety advancements. The underlying policy objective is to safeguard public safety by ensuring that aircraft comply with the highest airworthiness standards, thereby reducing the risk of accidents and incidents in civil aviation.
This legislative instrument revokes and re-issues multiple Airworthiness Directives for specific aircraft models, notably the Beechcraft 77 (Skipper) Series Aeroplanes, focusing on various components such as wing attachment bolts, rudder, aileron torque tube bearings, and more. Each directive is meticulously re-made to reflect the latest published editions, ensuring that all safety regulations are up-to-date and comprehensively cover the specified areas of concern. The overall aim is to maintain rigorous oversight and enforce strict compliance with safety mandates, ultimately contributing to the reliability and safety of Australian airspace.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, applies specifically to the Beechcraft 77 (Skipper) series aeroplanes. These directives are intended to ensure that the specified aircraft meet airworthiness standards by revoking previous directives and re-making them as separate instruments, as detailed in the attached schedules. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is national, impacting all operators within Australia who are subject to CASA regulations. These directives do not explicitly state exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but focus on specific maintenance, repair, and operational requirements for the listed aircraft components. The legislation's application is extended through the subordinate instruments attached, which detail specific directives for various aircraft parts and systems.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, as issued by David Alan Villiers, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), primarily serve to revoke and re-make a series of airworthiness directives (ADs) related to the Beechcraft 77 (Skipper) Series Aeroplanes. Specifically, section 1 of the legislative instrument revokes the ADs listed in Schedule 1 and section 2 re-makes each of these ADs as separate instruments. These ADs cover various critical aspects of the aircraft's airworthiness, including wing attachment bolts and nutplates (AD/BEECH 77/1), rudder and rudder trim tab (AD/BEECH 77/2), aileron torque tube bearings (AD/BEECH 77/3), elevator control arm bushings (AD/BEECH 77/4), control column installation (AD/BEECH 77/5), engine mount assembly to firewall attach bolts (AD/BEECH 77/6), shoulder harness attach bracket (AD/BEECH 77/7), horizontal stabiliser attach bolts (AD/BEECH 77/8), nose landing gear axle (AD/BEECH 77/9), nose landing gear attachment bolts (AD/BEECH 77/10), wing inspection, bolt replacement and fatigue life limitation (AD/BEECH 77/11), engine mount assembly and engine control linkage (AD/BEECH 77/12), engine control rod safety washers (AD/BEECH 77/13), rudder balance weight (AD/BEECH 77/14), and the alternator system (AD/BEECH 77/15).
These ADs impose specific obligations and requirements on the parties and entities governed by them, primarily focusing on the maintenance, inspection, and repair of the mentioned aircraft components. For instance, AD/BEECH 77/1 mandates the inspection and replacement of wing attachment bolts and nutplates, while AD/BEECH 77/2 requires the inspection and possible replacement of the rudder and rudder trim tab. These obligations are designed to ensure the safety and airworthiness of the Beechcraft 77 (Skipper) Series Aeroplanes by addressing potential hazards and defects that could compromise the aircraft's structural integrity or operational safety.
Failure to comply with these ADs can result in serious legal consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, non-compliance with an AD may lead to enforcement actions by CASA. The penalties for breach can include fines, with the maximum penalty varying depending on the nature and severity of the violation. For example, an individual or corporation may face a fine of up to $165,294 for each offence if the breach is deemed to be a serious safety violation. Additionally, persistent non-compliance or repeated breaches may lead to more severe consequences, including potential grounding of the aircraft until the required compliance is achieved. Therefore, adherence to these ADs is crucial to avoid legal repercussions and to ensure the continued airworthiness of the aircraft.