Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2009L02393 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2009 No. 118

 

 

Subject - Airports Act 1996

 

  Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1)

 

Section 252 of the Airports Act 1996 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required, or permitted by the Act to be prescribed or necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

The Airports (Building Control) Regulations 1996 (the Principal Regulations) provide for the approval of building activities and other works at leased airports by the Airport Building Controller (ABC).

The Regulations amend subregulation 2.11(7) in the Principal Regulations to clarify the status of building applications when there is an approved major development plan (MDP), in particular when the ABC is deemed to have refused such an application.  This rectifies an unanticipated outcome of previous amendments to the Principal Regulations.

 

The Regulations also insert a new subregulation 2.11(8) into the Principal Regulations to clarify that the ABC cannot consider a building application if it involves a building activity that is, or is part of, a major airport development and there is no approved MDP.  Once the MDP is approved under the Act, the ABC has 28 days to consider an application or request further information.

 

These Regulations also make amendments to provide that the decisions by the ABC under subregulation 2.11(7) and (8) may be subject to a merits review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).

 

Details of the amended regulations are set out in the Attachment.

 

The Act specifies no conditions that need to be satisfied before the power to make the amended Regulations may be exercised.  A comprehensive consultation process was undertaken when the Act was amended in 2007.  The amendments to the Principal Regulations are consequential to the 2007 amendments to the Act and their regulatory impact on business, individuals or the economy is nil or low.

 

These Regulations are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

These Regulations commence on the day after they are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

The Minute recommends that Regulations be made in the form proposed.

 

Authority: Section 252 of the Airports Act 1996


ATTACHMENT

Details of the Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1)

 

Regulation 1 – Name of Regulations

 

This regulation provides that the title of the Regulations is the Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1).

 

Regulation 2 – Commencement

 

This regulation provides for the Regulations to commence on the day after registration.

 

Regulation 3 – Amendment of Airports (Building Control) Regulations 1996

 

This regulation provides that the Airports (Building Control) Regulations 1996 (the Principal Regulations) are amended as set out in Schedule 1.

 

Schedule 1 – Amendments

 

Item [1] – Subregulation 2.11(7), including the notes

 

Item 1 amends subregulation 2.11(7) and inserts a new subregulation 2.11(8).  The item clarifies that subregulation 2.11(7) applies to a situation where an applicant has lodged an application for approval of building activity which is, or comprises part of, a major airport development for which an MDP has been approved or taken to be approved pursuant to section 94 of the Act.

 

Paragraph 2.11(7)(a) provides that the ABC is deemed to have refused the application for approval of the building activity if the ABC has not given the applicant notice of its decision before the end of 28 days after receiving the application and the ABC has not requested further information.

 

Under paragraph 2.11(7)(b), if the ABC has requested further information regarding the application but has not given the applicant notice of its decision before the end of 28 days after receiving the information the application is deemed to be refused.

 

New subregulation 2.11(8) applies to situations where an applicant has lodged an application for approval of building activity which is, or comprises part of, a major airport development for which an MDP has not been approved or taken to be approved pursuant to section 94 of the Act.

 

The ABC cannot make a decision, pursuant to subregulation 2.11(1A), regarding such applications until the MDP is approved, or taken to be approved.  The application is effectively frozen until the MDP is approved or taken to be approved.  The application revives once this occurs and the ABC is able to make a decision regarding the application.

 

New paragraph 2.11(8)(a) provides that the application for approval of building activity is deemed to be refused by the ABC if the ABC has not given its decision to the applicant before the end of 28 days from the time the MDP has been approved and the ABC has not requested further information from the applicant.

 

New paragraph 2.11(8)(b) covers situations when the MDP has been approved or taken to be approved and further information is requested by the ABC regarding the application.  In this case, the application is deemed to be refused if the ABC has not given the applicant notice of its decision before the end of 28 days after receiving the information.

 

Item [2] Regulation 6.01, table, Part 1, item 1, second column

 

Item 2 amends the table in regulation 6.01 to include subregulations 2.11(7) and (8).  This means that decisions by the ABC in relation to subregulations 2.11(1), (6), (7) and (8) may be subject to a merits review by the AAT upon the application of the applicant for the building approval.

Overview

The Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1) were introduced to amend the Airports (Building Control) Regulations 1996 under the Airports Act 1996. This legislative instrument aims to address an unanticipated outcome of previous amendments to the Principal Regulations regarding the status of building applications in relation to approved major development plans (MDPs) at leased airports. The problem it addresses was identified during the course of amendments made to the Act in 2007. These Regulations were enacted by the Governor-General under section 252 of the Airports Act 1996 and are intended to clarify the process for the Airport Building Controller (ABC) in assessing building applications, ensuring there is no ambiguity in the approval process when an MDP has been approved or is pending approval. The policy objective of these Regulations is to streamline the approval process for building activities at leased airports, ensuring that the ABC can make timely and clear decisions on building applications in accordance with the status of the relevant MDPs.

Scope and Application

The Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1) apply to building activities and other works at leased airports in Australia, specifically targeting the process and timeliness of approval of building applications by the Airport Building Controller (ABC) as stipulated in the Airports Act 1996. These regulations are designed to ensure that the ABC's decisions regarding building activities, particularly those that form part of a major airport development, are handled in a timely and consistent manner, clarifying the status of applications when there is an approved major development plan (MDP) and ensuring that applications cannot be considered without an approved MDP. The amendments also provide that decisions made by the ABC under the specified subregulations may be subject to a merits review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). The scope of these regulations is limited to the procedural aspects of building control at leased airports, with no specified geographic limitations beyond these airports. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds in the regulations themselves, although they operate within the broader framework of the Airports Act 1996. The application of these regulations is direct and does not rely on subordinate instruments for extension or restriction.

Key Provisions

The Airports (Building Control) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1) amend the Airports (Building Control) Regulations 1996 to provide clarity on the status of building applications at leased airports when there is an approved major development plan (MDP). Specifically, subregulation 2.11(7) is modified to clarify that an application for building activity, which is part of a major airport development for which an MDP has been approved, is deemed to be refused if the Airport Building Controller (ABC) has not made a decision within 28 days of receiving the application or after requesting further information (Reg 1[1]). A new subregulation 2.11(8) is also inserted to clarify that the ABC cannot consider a building application if it involves a building activity that is part of a major airport development and there is no approved MDP. The application is effectively put on hold until the MDP is approved, at which point the application is revived and the ABC must make a decision within 28 days of the approval or after requesting further information (Reg 1[1]). The amended regulations impose several obligations on the ABC and applicants for building approval. For the ABC, these include the requirement to make decisions on building applications within specific timeframes, i.e., 28 days from receiving an application or after requesting further information, under subregulations 2.11(7) and (8). If these timeframes are not met, the application is deemed to be refused (Reg 1[1]). For applicants, the regulations clarify the conditions under which their applications will be considered, particularly in relation to major airport developments and the approval status of MDPs (Reg 1[1]). The ABC must also ensure that any decision made under subregulations 2.11(7) and (8) can be subject to a merits review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) upon application by the applicant (Reg 1[2]). Failure to comply with the provisions of these amended regulations may result in significant consequences for the ABC and applicants. For the ABC, not adhering to the specified timeframes for making decisions on building applications could lead to the automatic refusal of applications, which may have legal and operational repercussions. For applicants, not understanding or complying with the conditions under which their applications will be considered, particularly regarding major airport developments and MDP approval status, may result in their applications being deemed refused. Additionally, any decision by the ABC under subregulations 2.11(7) and (8) may be subject to a merits review by the AAT, which could further delay or complicate the approval process (Reg 1[2]). The regulations do not specify any penalties for breach; however, the consequences of non-compliance could include legal challenges, delays in development projects, and potential financial losses for the parties involved.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Merits Review

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.