Statutory Rules
1977 No. 203
REGULATIONS UNDER THE AIR FORCE ACT 1923*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Air Force Act 1923.
Dated this twenty-seventh day of October 1977.
John R. Kerr
Governor-General
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for Defence
AMENDMENTS OF THE AIR FORCE REGULATIONS†
Service beyond retiring age
1. Regulation 469 of the Air Force Regulations is repealed.
Air Training Corps
2. Part VIIIa of the Air Force Regulations is repealed.
* Notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 3 November 1977.
† Statutory Rules 1927, No. 161 as amended to date. For previous amendments of the Air Force Regulations see footnote † Statutory Rules 1977, No. 5 and see also Statutory Rules 1977, Nos. 5 and 38.
Printed by Authority by the Acting Commonwealth Government Printer
14509/77 Cat. No. —Recommended retail price 10c 12/5.8.1977
Overview
The Air Force Act 1923, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was established to provide a framework for the governance and administration of the Australian Air Force. These regulations, introduced in 1977, serve to amend the existing Air Force Regulations, reflecting changes in operational requirements and policy objectives. One of the primary aims of these amendments is to address the issue of service beyond the retiring age, thereby ensuring that personnel are appropriately managed in terms of their career longevity and retirement. Another key change pertains to the Air Training Corps, which has been repealed to streamline the regulatory environment and focus on current training methodologies and structures. These amendments aim to modernise the legislative framework to better align with contemporary operational needs and strategic goals of the Australian Defence Force.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1977 No. 203, made under the Air Force Act 1923, introduce amendments to the Air Force Regulations concerning the service of personnel beyond the retiring age and the Air Training Corps. These regulations apply to members of the Australian Defence Force, particularly the Royal Australian Air Force, and encompass all personnel who are affected by the provisions regarding service beyond retiring age and the Air Training Corps. The geographic scope of these regulations is national, as they pertain to the federal jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Australia. While the regulations do not explicitly outline exclusions or thresholds, they do modify existing rules to ensure compliance with the overarching Air Force Act 1923. These regulations also extend the application of the Act through subordinate instruments, ensuring that any future amendments or specific directives are aligned with the objectives of the primary legislation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of these Regulations involve specific amendments to the Air Force Regulations under the Air Force Act 1923. Regulation 469, which pertains to service beyond the retiring age, has been repealed (section 1). This change likely means that previously established rules governing the continuation of service beyond a certain age are no longer applicable. Part VIIIa of the Air Force Regulations, concerning the Air Training Corps, has also been repealed (section 2). This suggests that provisions related to the governance, administration, and operational details of the Air Training Corps are no longer in effect under the current regulations.
The obligations and requirements imposed by these Regulations are primarily focused on the formal repeal of specific sections of the Air Force Regulations. The repeal of Regulation 469 removes the previous framework for service beyond the retiring age, which may necessitate new policies or agreements for such scenarios. The repeal of Part VIIIa affects the oversight and functioning of the Air Training Corps, requiring any future governance or training activities to be addressed under different provisions or regulations.
In terms of legal consequences, these Regulations themselves do not explicitly state any offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance. However, the repealed sections would have included specific obligations and rules, and non-compliance with those provisions prior to their repeal could have resulted in penalties under the original regulations. For example, Regulation 469 might have specified penalties for exceeding the retiring age without proper authorisation, and Part VIIIa would have outlined consequences for non-compliance with Air Training Corps governance rules. These potential penalties would have been outlined in the original regulations that are now repealed.