Air Force Regulations (Amendment)

Administered by Department of Defence

Legislation au F1997B00504 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1939. No. 142.

 

REGULATIONS UNDER THE AIR FORCE ACT 1923.*

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Air Force Act 1923.

Dated this Eighth day of November, 1939.

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

Minister of State for Defence.

 

Amendments of the Air Force Regulations.†

Air Board—Distribution of Duties.

1. Regulation 30 of the Air Force Regulations is amended by—

(a) inserting in paragraph (a) of sub-regulation (2.), after the word “employment,”, the words “fighting efficiency, collective training,”; and

(b) inserting in paragraph (b) of sub-regulation (2.), after the words “discipline and”, the word “individual”.

Court-martial—Promulgation.

2. Regulation 392 of the Air Force Regulations is amended—

(a) by omitting from sub-regulation (1.) the words “the next succeeding sub-regulation” and inserting in their stead the words “sub-regulation (2.) or (5.) of this regulation”; and

(b) by adding at the end thereof the following sub-regulation:—

“(5.) If, after conviction but before the promulgation of the charge, finding, sentence, recommendation to mercy, if any, and confirmation can be effected in accordance with sub-regulation (1.) or (2.) of this regulation, the member convicted absents himself and—

(a) in the case of an airman, a court of inquiry in pursuance of regulation 244 of these Regulations makes a declaration in respect of his absence: or

 

* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on , 1939.

† Statutory Rules 1927, No. 161, as amended by Statutory Rules 1928, Nos. 52 and 109; 1929, Nos. 75 and 114; 1930, Nos. 77, 94 and 135; 1931, Nos. 3, 78 and 115; 1932, Nos. 9, 63 and 133; 1933, Nos. 16, 46, 58, 82, 89 and 117; 1934, Nos. 25, 51, 74, 81, 122 and 125; 1935, Nos. 32 and, 98; 1936, No. 17; 1937, No. 21; 1938, Nos. 12, 13, 22, 48, 77, 97 and 120; and 1939, Nos. 21 and 64.—Thirty-ninth amendment.

5896.—7/4.10.1939.—Price 3d.


(b) in the case of an officer, the commanding officer furnishes a certificate (which shall be annexed to the court-martial proceedings) that the officer convicted has been absent for a period of twenty-one days,

promulgation may be effected by the publication of the charge, finding, sentence, recommendation to mercy, if any, and confirmation in the daily routine orders of the unit. Notwithstanding such promulgation, these particulars shall be communicated to the member convicted as soon as practicable after his surrender or his apprehension, if he is liable for further service.”,

Rates of pay of airmen of the Permanent Air Force.

3. Regulation 553 of the Air Force Regulations is amended—

(a) by inserting in sub-regulation (2.), after the words “motor trimmer,”, the word “painter,”; and

(b) by omitting from sub-regulation (3.) the word “painter,”.

Duty pay for crew of Armoured Motor Boat.

4. After regulation 555 of the Air Force Regulations the following regulation is inserted:—

“555a. Duty pay may, subject to such conditions as are approved by the Air Board, be paid to a member of the crew of an armoured motor boat as follows:—

(a) sixpence for each day during which a boat proceeds to sea on duty when not employed as a target; or

(b) one shilling for each day during which a boat is employed as a target:

Provided that the duty pay payable under this regulation to any member in respect of any one day shall not exceed one shilling.”.

Funeral expenses.

5. Regulation 666 of the Air Force Regulations is amended by omitting from sub-regulation (2.) the words “two second class railway warrants” and inserting in their stead the words “two first class railway warrants, but not including sleeping berths,”.

 

By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.

Overview

The Air Force Regulations 1939, made under the Air Force Act 1923, were introduced to address the need for amendments to existing regulations governing the Australian Air Force. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, these regulations aimed to update various aspects of the Air Force's operational and administrative procedures, including the distribution of duties within the Air Board, the promulgation of court-martial proceedings, rates of pay for airmen, duty pay for crew members of armoured motor boats, and funeral expenses. The overarching policy objective was to ensure that the Air Force's regulations remained current and effectively supported its operational needs and the welfare of its personnel.

Scope and Application

The Regulations under the Air Force Act 1923, promulgated in 1939, encompass a range of amendments to the Air Force Regulations, primarily affecting personnel within the Australian Air Force. These regulations apply to airmen and officers, as well as the Air Board, which is responsible for the distribution of duties. The amendments cover various aspects such as employment, fighting efficiency, collective training, discipline, and individual training, among others. The geographic reach of these regulations is national, as they pertain to the Commonwealth of Australia. Notably, the regulations have been amended to adjust the rates of pay for airmen, specify conditions for duty pay for crew members of armoured motor boats, and modify funeral expenses allowances. While the primary focus is on personnel within the Air Force, the regulations also impact the Air Board and other entities responsible for administering and managing the affairs of the Air Force. The regulations extend their application through the amendment process, allowing for further adjustments and refinements as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Regulations under the Air Force Act 1923 primarily focus on the amendment of several sections of the Air Force Regulations to refine roles, duties, and financial provisions within the Air Force. Regulation 30, pertaining to the distribution of duties within the Air Board, has been amended to include "fighting efficiency" and "collective training" in the responsibilities of paragraph (a) of sub-regulation (2), and "individual" in paragraph (b) of sub-regulation (2). Regulation 392, regarding the promulgation of court-martial outcomes, has been amended to allow for publication in daily routine orders if a convicted member has been absent for a specified period, and Regulation 553, which deals with the rates of pay of airmen of the Permanent Air Force, has been altered to add "painter" to the list of positions in sub-regulation (2) and to omit "painter" from sub-regulation (3). Furthermore, a new regulation, 555a, has been introduced to provide duty pay for the crew of armoured motor boats, allowing for specific rates based on whether the boat is on duty or employed as a target, with a cap of one shilling per day. Lastly, Regulation 666, concerning funeral expenses, has been updated to replace "two second class railway warrants" with "two first class railway warrants, but not including sleeping berths." The obligations imposed by these regulations require the Air Board to ensure that duties related to fighting efficiency and collective training are appropriately managed and that individual discipline is maintained among airmen. The amendments necessitate that court-martial outcomes be promulgated in certain circumstances, particularly when a convicted member is absent. The regulations also mandate that duty pay be calculated and disbursed according to the new provisions for armoured motor boat crews, and that funeral expenses are covered as per the updated guidelines. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in various consequences. The promulgation of court-martial outcomes, if not properly handled, may lead to delays or improper communication of judicial decisions within the Air Force. Additionally, any mismanagement of duty pay for armoured motor boat crews could result in financial discrepancies or dissatisfaction among personnel. Non-compliance with the funeral expense provisions could lead to inadequate support for the families of deceased airmen. Although the text does not specify penalties, breaches of these regulations could potentially lead to disciplinary actions or other administrative measures as outlined in the Air Force Act 1923.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Military Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Repeal & Amendment
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.