EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Select Legislative Instrument 2005 No. 104
Issued by authority of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.
Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992
Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1)
Section 73 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed; or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
In March 2005, the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry finalised a Cost Recovery Impact Statement on the Proposed Cost Recovery Framework for the National Registration Scheme for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (the CRIS). The CRIS proposed a new cost basis to fully recover the costs of providing export certificates issued by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under section 69D of the Act.
The regulations prescribe, for the purposes of subsection 69D(1) of the Act, the fee for a certificate setting out the findings (if any) of the APVMA in relation to any matters relating to a chemical product that are required to be established for the purposes of its export.
Details of the regulations are in the Attachment.
The regulations commence on 1 July 2005.
The regulations are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Authority: Section 73 of the Agricultural and
Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992
Attachment
DETAILS OF THE AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICALS (ADMINISTRATION) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2005 (No. 1)
Regulation 1
Regulation 1 provides for the name of the Regulations to be the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1).
Regulation 2
Regulation 2 provides for the Regulations to commence on 1 July 2005.
Regulation 3
Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995 (the Principal Regulations).
SCHEDULE 1 – Amendments
Item [1] Regulation 3.550
This item substitutes a new regulation 3.550 for the existing 3.550. New regulation 3.550 prescribes the following fees for the purposes of subsection 69D(1) of the Act:
(1) $115 as a standard fee for a certificate;
(2) a further $95 for a certificate that requires the APVMA to undertake a technical or scientific assessment.
Subregulation 3.550(2) sets out the circumstances in which no fee is payable for a certificate. No fee is payable for a certificate (the subsequent certificate) if the applicant applies for the certificate on the same day as they applied for another certificate (the original certificate) provided that the original certificate and the subsequent certificate are the same in all respects or the same except for the following:
(i) the addressee of the certificate;
(ii) the country to which the chemical is to be exported;
(iii) the authority of the country to which the chemical is to be exported.
Subregulation 3.550(3) prescribes for the purposes of subsection 69D(1) of the Act fees that are required to be paid in circumstances where a consular act is required to be performed in relation to a particular certificate. Those fees are prescribed to be the fees prescribed for those consular acts as set out in the Consular Fees Regulations 1990.
Overview
The Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) were enacted to implement a new cost recovery framework for export certificates issued by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992. These regulations were introduced to fully recover the costs associated with providing export certificates for chemical products, as proposed in the Cost Recovery Impact Statement finalised by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry in March 2005. The policy objective was to ensure that the fees charged for these certificates reflect the true cost of the services provided by the APVMA. The regulations were made under the authority of section 73 of the Act and commenced on 1 July 2005. They represent a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) apply to the administration and regulation of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in Australia, specifically in relation to the fees associated with the issuance of export certificates by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). These regulations amend the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995, prescribing fees for export certificates as per section 69D(1) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992. The regulations are applicable to any person or entity seeking to export agricultural and veterinary chemicals from Australia, ensuring that the APVMA can recover costs associated with issuing export certificates. The fees are set at $115 for a standard certificate and an additional $95 if a technical or scientific assessment is required. Exemptions from fees apply in certain circumstances, such as when a subsequent certificate is the same as an original certificate except for minor differences like the addressee or the export destination. These regulations are part of a broader framework designed to manage and regulate the use of chemicals in agriculture and veterinary practice across Australia.
Key Provisions
The Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) (the Regulations) amend the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995 (the Principal Regulations) to introduce new fees for export certificates under the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992 (the Act). Regulation 3.550, as set out in Schedule 1 of the Regulations, specifies that a standard fee of $115 applies for a certificate under subsection 69D(1) of the Act. Where a certificate necessitates a technical or scientific assessment by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), an additional fee of $95 is required. Furthermore, subregulation 3.550(2) provides that no fee is payable if the applicant submits a new certificate application on the same day as a previous application, and the new certificate is identical to the previous one, except for the addressee, the country of export, or the authority of the export country. Subregulation 3.550(3) outlines that fees prescribed for consular acts, as set out in the Consular Fees Regulations 1990, apply when a consular act is required in relation to a particular certificate.
The Regulations impose obligations on applicants for export certificates under the Act. Firstly, applicants must pay the prescribed fees for their certificates, with the option of paying an additional fee if a technical or scientific assessment is required. Secondly, applicants who submit a new certificate application on the same day as a previous application, and the new certificate is identical to the previous one except for the addressee, country of export, or export authority, may be exempt from paying the fee for the new certificate. Lastly, applicants who require a consular act to be performed in relation to their certificate must pay the fees for those consular acts as set out in the Consular Fees Regulations 1990.
Failure to comply with the Regulations and the Act may result in penalties. However, the Explanatory Statement does not explicitly state the penalties for non-compliance. The Act, in general, provides for various penalties for breaches, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the offence. The maximum penalties for offences under the Act may vary, and specific details can be found within the Act itself. It is essential for applicants and other relevant parties to adhere to the requirements and obligations outlined in the Regulations and the Act to avoid potential penalties and consequences.