Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1)

Administered by Department of Agriculture

Legislation au F2012L01647 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2012 No. 180

 

Issued by Authority of the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

 

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992

 

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1)

 

 

Section 73 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992 (the Act) provides that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

 

The Regulation amends the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995 (the Principal Regulations) to update the framework for controls on the exportation of chemicals in order to reflect changes to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (the Rotterdam Convention).

 

The Regulation further updates controls relating to the specified active constituents alachlor, aldicarb and endosulfan, or chemical products containing these active constituents, to enable Australia to meet its obligations as a party to the Rotterdam Convention.

 

Companies wishing to export controlled chemicals already need to apply for permission from the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.  No additional importation controls are necessary under the Rotterdam Convention as importation of these chemicals is already regulated under the National Registration Scheme for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals.

 

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) commenced on the day after it was registered and amended Subregulation 1.3 (1) to update the definitions of Rotterdam Convention and Stockholm Convention.  The Regulation amended Schedule 1 to the Principal Regulations to add alachlor, aldicarb and endosulfan, which are considered to have adverse effects on human health and the environment.  The Regulation amended Schedule 1 to review numbering so as to continue alphabetic listing of chemicals.

 

Subsection 69C(2) of the Act provides that a regulation prescribing conditions or restrictions on the import, manufacture, use or export of certain chemical products under international agreements must not be made unless:

 

(a)   a relevant agency has published in the Gazette, and in any other manner that it thinks appropriate, a notice:

(i)                 identifying the agreement or arrangement; and

(ii)               listing the name or names by which the constituent or product is known to the public; and

(b)   a period of 30 days has elapsed since the notice was published.

 

On 20 December 2011, a notice identifying the amendments to the listing of chemicals that are subject to the Rotterdam Convention was published in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. APVMA 25.

 

The Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities presented the changes at a hearing of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties and they supported the amendments to the list of chemicals controlled by the Rotterdam Convention and agreed that binding action may be taken.  The Office of Best Practice Regulation was consulted in the preparation of the Regulation (ID 13465)

 

The Regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

The Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is contained in the Attachment.

 

 


ATTACHMENT

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1)

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

The Regulation amends the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995 (the Principal Regulations) to update the framework for controls on the exportation of chemicals in order to reflect changes to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (the Rotterdam Convention).  The Regulation further updates controls relating to specified active constituents, or chemical products containing these active constituents, to enable Australia to meet its obligations as a Party to the Rotterdam Convention

 

The amendment to the Principal Regulations adds alachlor, aldicarb and endosulfan, which are considered to have adverse effects on human health and the environment.

 

 

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

 

Senator the Hon Joseph William Ludwig

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

 

 

Overview

The Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) was enacted to address the need for updating the regulatory framework governing the export of hazardous chemicals in Australia to align with the changes in the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. This regulation, issued by authority of the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, modifies the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995 to ensure that Australian export controls reflect the updated obligations under the Rotterdam Convention. Additionally, it includes specific updates to controls on chemicals such as alachlor, aldicarb, and endosulfan, which are identified as having adverse effects on human health and the environment, thereby enabling Australia to meet its commitments under the Convention. The regulation ensures that no additional importation controls are necessary as importation of these chemicals is already regulated under the National Registration Scheme for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals.

Scope and Application

The Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) amends the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995 to enhance the regulatory framework governing the export of hazardous chemicals in line with the updated Rotterdam Convention. This regulatory update applies to entities and individuals involved in the export of specified chemicals and those who handle chemicals containing the active constituents alachlor, aldicarb, and endosulfan. The regulation is necessary for Australia to fulfil its obligations under the Rotterdam Convention, which mandates the prior informed consent procedure for the international trade of hazardous chemicals. The amendment introduces stricter controls on these specific chemicals, reflecting their known adverse effects on human health and the environment. The regulation applies nationally, ensuring a uniform approach across all states and territories in compliance with international agreements. There are no additional importation controls required under this regulation, as the importation of these chemicals is already regulated under the National Registration Scheme for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals. The regulation came into effect after the requisite public notice was published and the mandatory 30-day consultation period had elapsed, aligning with the procedural requirements set forth in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) update the framework for controlling the exportation of hazardous chemicals and pesticides, in line with the changes to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (section 1). Specifically, it updates the controls on the export of chemicals such as alachlor, aldicarb, and endosulfan, which have adverse effects on human health and the environment. These updates are necessary to ensure that Australia meets its obligations as a party to the Rotterdam Convention (section 2). The Regulation also amends the definitions of Rotterdam Convention and Stockholm Convention in Subregulation 1.3(1) to reflect these changes (section 3). Moreover, the Regulation adds alachlor, aldicarb, and endosulfan to Schedule 1 of the Principal Regulations, maintaining the alphabetical listing of chemicals for clarity and accessibility (section 4). The obligations imposed by the Regulation on the parties and entities it governs include the requirement for companies to apply for permission from the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry to export controlled chemicals. This process ensures that the export of hazardous chemicals is strictly regulated and monitored to protect human health and the environment. Furthermore, the Regulation mandates that relevant agencies publish notices identifying the amendments to the list of chemicals subject to the Rotterdam Convention in the Gazette and any other appropriate manner, followed by a 30-day waiting period before the Regulation takes effect (section 5). This ensures transparency and provides stakeholders with sufficient time to prepare for and comply with the new regulations. Any breaches of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) can result in various civil and criminal consequences. Offences under the Act include the unauthorised export of controlled chemicals, which can lead to substantial penalties. The maximum penalty for such offences is detailed in the Act and can include fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and frequency of the breach. Additionally, any entity found in violation of the Regulation may face legal action, including injunctions or other remedies, to enforce compliance. It is crucial for companies and entities to adhere to the requirements of the Regulation to avoid these potential consequences and ensure they are operating within the legal framework governing the exportation of hazardous chemicals.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.