AFFIRMATION OF OFFICE
I, LINDA MARION DESSAU, do swear that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law, in the administration of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of the Commonwealth of Australia, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.
Linda Dessau
Sworn, declared and subscribed by the abovenamed Linda Marion Dessau at Melbourne in the State of Victoria before me on 20 October 2016 | | Michelle Gordon Justice of the High Court of Australia |
Overview
The Commonwealth of Australia, through the Governor-General's affirmation of office, established in 2016, underscores the commitment of public officials to serve the nation faithfully and impartially. This affirmation, as exemplified by the affirmation of Linda Marion Dessau as the Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, aligns with the fundamental principle of public service in Australia, which is to administer the government according to the laws and usages of the Commonwealth without bias. The affirmation is mandated by the Constitution of Australia and serves to ensure that individuals appointed to public office are dedicated to upholding the rule of law and providing equitable services to all citizens. It is an integral part of the legislative framework that governs the conduct of public officials and is intended to maintain the integrity and impartiality of the Australian government.
Scope and Application
The legislation outlined in the document, C2016G01660, pertains to the affirmation of office for Linda Marion Dessau as a public servant under the Commonwealth of Australia. The affirmation is sworn before Michelle Gordon, a Justice of the High Court of Australia, and is dated 20 October 2016. This Act applies to Linda Marion Dessau in her capacity as a public servant, committing her to serve the Commonwealth of Australia and its laws faithfully. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying throughout the Commonwealth of Australia, as it pertains to her role in the administration of government at a federal level. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but it is understood that the affirmation is a formal declaration required of all public servants entering office, ensuring they adhere to their duties and obligations under Australian law. The application of this Act is not extended or restricted by subordinate instruments mentioned in the document.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Affirmation of Office (C2016G01660) (1) require the individual, in this case Linda Marion Dessau, to swear an oath to serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors, in the administration of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia. The oath also mandates the individual to administer their office fairly and impartially, in accordance with the laws and usages of Australia, without any personal bias, fear, favour, affection, or ill will towards any person or group. This affirmation is a solemn declaration of the individual's commitment to their public duties and responsibilities.
The obligations imposed by the Affirmation of Office Act on parties such as Linda Marion Dessau are primarily centred around the principles of fidelity, impartiality, and adherence to the law. The individual must pledge to carry out their official duties with integrity and without prejudice, ensuring that all actions taken are in accordance with the legal framework governing the Commonwealth of Australia. The act serves as a legal requirement for individuals assuming public office, establishing the foundational expectations and ethical standards they must uphold.
Failure to comply with the requirements set forth in the Affirmation of Office Act may result in legal consequences. While specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences are not detailed within the text, the act itself underscores the gravity of the oath and the potential ramifications of failing to adhere to its stipulations. The omission of explicit penalties in the text does not diminish the seriousness of the oath; rather, it emphasises the intrinsic responsibility and accountability inherent in public service. The individual's commitment to the oath is legally binding, and any breach may lead to significant consequences, including the possibility of legal action or removal from office.