Overview

The Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Act 1999-2000 was enacted to facilitate the appropriation of funds to parliamentary departments and agencies, ensuring that financial resources are allocated effectively for the operation and administration of the Parliament. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a structured and systematic approach to budgetary management within parliamentary settings, allowing for adjustments and reallocations as necessary to meet the operational demands of the Parliament. The enacting body was the Parliament of Australia, with the primary policy objective being to enhance financial accountability and efficiency in the allocation and use of public funds within parliamentary departments. In line with section 11 (3) of the Act, the appropriation item for the Senate's administered expenses has been increased by $95,000. This adjustment was made to ensure that the Senate can continue to operate effectively, supporting its legislative and oversight functions. The amendment reflects the dynamic nature of parliamentary work and the need to respond to emerging requirements, ensuring that the Senate maintains its capacity to fulfil its constitutional and administrative roles.

Scope and Application

The Legislative Instrument F2007B00935 pertains to the appropriation of funds to specific parliamentary departments under the Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Act 1999-2000. This legislative instrument outlines the allocation of financial resources to the Senate and the Budget Coordination Unit, detailing an increase in appropriation for the administered expenses outcome. The act applies to the Commonwealth level, specifically affecting the Senate and the Budget Coordination Unit, thereby impacting the overall functioning and budget execution of these parliamentary entities. The amendment is executed under section 11(3) of the Act, which allows for the adjustment of appropriations following the advice of the Clerk of the Senate, ensuring that the increased funding meets the operational needs as determined. This legislative instrument does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond the scope of the appropriation increase, and any further application or restrictions are to be governed by the overarching Act.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Legislative Instrument F2007B00935 pertain to appropriations for parliamentary departments, specifically detailing the increase in funding for the Senate. According to section 11 (3) of the Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Act 1999-2000, the appropriation item for "Administered Expenses Outcome 1" has been increased by $95,000. This adjustment is made by the Budget Coordination Unit, as referenced in column 2 of the legislative instrument, which also identifies Stephen Mayes as the responsible individual. The date of the adjustment, 19 May 2000, is noted in column 3. The Act imposes several obligations on the entities it governs. Firstly, it mandates that any changes to appropriation items must be duly noted and communicated through a formal legislative instrument, such as F2007B00935. This ensures transparency and accountability in the allocation of funds. Additionally, the Act requires that the increase in funding be specified clearly, along with the responsible agency and individual, as shown in the provided columns. The legislative instrument must also be issued in compliance with the relevant sections of the Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Act 1999-2000, particularly section 11 (3), which governs the manner in which such adjustments are to be made. Failure to adhere to the provisions of the Act could result in various consequences. While the document itself does not specify penalties for non-compliance, breaches of appropriation laws could lead to legal and administrative repercussions. Such consequences might include audits, investigations, and potential financial penalties. The severity of these penalties would depend on the specific nature and impact of the non-compliance, as well as any additional legislative provisions that may apply. In general, it is crucial for the entities involved to ensure strict compliance to avoid any adverse outcomes.