ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER – SECTION 11 OF APPROPRIATION ACT (No.1) 2002-2003
I, Jim Kerwin, Manager, Financial Reporting and Cash Management Division, Financial Management Group, Department of Finance and Administration, pursuant to Section 11 of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2002-2003, hereby determine that the appropriation item listed in Column 1 for the agency listed in Column 2 be increased by the amount listed in Column 3.
Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
Appropriation Item | Agency | Amount |
| | $ |
| | |
Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2002-2003 | Department of Health and Ageing | 954,592 |
Administered Expenses – Outcome 6 | | |
To reduce the consequence of hearing loss for eligible clients and the incidence of hearing loss in the broader community | | |
| | |
| | |
Jim Kerwin No. 18 of 2002-2003
23 June 2003
Overview
The Advance to the Finance Minister – Section 11 of Appropriation Act (No.1) 2002-2003 is a legislative instrument issued under the authority of the Appropriation Act (No.1) 2002-2003. This instrument was introduced to address the need for additional funding within the specified appropriation item for the Department of Health and Ageing. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the purpose of this legislative instrument is to allocate an additional $954,592 to the Administered Expenses – Outcome 6, with the aim of reducing the impact of hearing loss on eligible clients and decreasing the incidence of hearing loss within the broader community. This measure underscores the government's commitment to addressing public health issues through targeted financial provisions.
Scope and Application
This legislative instrument, under Section 11 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2002-2003, specifically pertains to the Department of Health and Ageing, impacting its allocation of funds for administered expenses. The appropriation item in question is "Administered Expenses – Outcome 6", which is designated to address the reduction of hearing loss consequences for eligible clients and the broader community. The financial adjustment amounts to an increase of $954,592. This legislative action applies directly to the Department of Health and Ageing, thereby influencing its budgetary capacity to deliver services related to hearing loss. Geographically, the Act operates within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, governing financial allocations at a national level. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions mentioned in the text, suggesting the adjustment applies comprehensively to the specified appropriation item. The instrument does not provide information on whether further application or restrictions are imposed through subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
Section 11 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2002-2003 empowers the designated manager to adjust the appropriation items listed in a specific table. This section outlines the increase in funding for a particular appropriation item, in this case, the Department of Health and Ageing, by the amount specified. The appropriation item in question is the Administered Expenses – Outcome 6, aimed at reducing the impact of hearing loss for eligible clients and lowering its incidence in the general population. This legislative instrument is a directive from Jim Kerwin, Manager of the Financial Reporting and Cash Management Division in the Department of Finance and Administration, dated 23 June 2003.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, the manager must ensure that the appropriation items are correctly identified and accurately reflected in the table. This involves careful review and verification to avoid errors that could lead to financial mismanagement. Secondly, the manager must ensure that the increase in appropriation aligns with the intended objectives of the funding, particularly in this case, to support initiatives aimed at reducing hearing loss. Thirdly, the manager must ensure that all changes are documented and communicated effectively to relevant stakeholders, including the Department of Health and Ageing, to facilitate smooth implementation and accountability.
Breaches of the obligations set out in the Act can lead to serious consequences. If the manager fails to accurately reflect the appropriation items or if the funds are misallocated, it could result in financial discrepancies and potential legal repercussions. The Act does not specify particular offences, but general breaches of administrative law could lead to civil or criminal penalties. The consequences could include fines or even imprisonment for individuals found to be negligent or intentionally misleading in their financial reporting. The exact penalties would depend on the severity of the breach and could be determined in a court of law, potentially leading to maximum penalties as stipulated by relevant legislation.