Advance to the Finance Minister – section 10 of Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000 (No. 25 of 1999-2000)

Administered by Department of Finance

Legislation au F2007B00774 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER – SECTION 10 OF APPROPRIATION ACT (No.2) 1999-2000

 

I, Phillip Prior, SES Band 2, Budget Group, Department of Finance and Administration, pursuant to Section 10 of Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000, hereby determine that the appropriation item listed in Column 1 for the agency listed in Column 2 be increased by the amount listed in Column 3.

 

 

 

 

Column 1
Appropriation Item

Column 2
Agency

Column 3
Amount

 

 

$

 

 

 

Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000

Department of Industry, Science and Resources

 

Administered Expenses

 

 

 Outcome No 1

 

77,205,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phillip Prior               No. 25 of 1999-2000
28 June 2000

Overview

The legislative instrument F2007B00774, issued in 2000, is an advancement to the Finance Minister under Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000. This legislative instrument was enacted to address the need for additional funding for the Department of Industry, Science and Resources for the financial year 1999-2000. Authorised by Phillip Prior, SES Band 2 from the Budget Group in the Department of Finance and Administration, the instrument specifies an increase in the appropriation item for administered expenses under Outcome No 1, amounting to $77,205,000. The enacting body is the Australian Parliament, with the clear policy objective of ensuring adequate financial resources are allocated to support the Department's activities for that fiscal year.

Scope and Application

The legislative instrument F2007B00774 pertains to the adjustment of appropriation items for the financial year 1999-2000, specifically targeting the Department of Industry, Science and Resources. As per the determination under Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000, the appropriation for administered expenses under Outcome No 1 is increased by $77,205,000. This adjustment applies directly to the specified agency and its associated outcomes for the financial year in question. The legislation extends its reach to the Commonwealth level, ensuring the provision of additional funding to support the department's activities and initiatives as outlined in the appropriation act. The instrument does not explicitly mention any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, and any further application details or extensions are to be found in the subordinate instruments, if applicable.

Key Provisions

Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000, as referenced by Phillip Prior in the legislative instrument F2007B00774, serves as the legal basis for increasing appropriations for specific agencies. According to this section, Phillip Prior, as an SES Band 2 officer in the Budget Group of the Department of Finance and Administration, is authorised to adjust the appropriations allocated to various agencies. In this case, Phillip Prior has determined that the appropriation item for Administered Expenses under Outcome No 1 for the Department of Industry, Science and Resources must be increased by $77,205,000. The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act necessitate that Phillip Prior meticulously verify the necessity and compliance of the proposed increase with the budgetary constraints and legislative mandates. Before making any adjustments, Phillip Prior must ensure that the increase aligns with the fiscal policies and priorities established for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Furthermore, Phillip Prior is required to document the rationale behind the appropriation increase, which includes providing detailed justification and supporting evidence for the requested funds. This documentation is essential for maintaining transparency and accountability in the budget allocation process. The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches related to the adjustment of appropriations. However, the implications of non-compliance could be significant. Any misallocation or unjustified increase in appropriations could lead to financial mismanagement and potential legal scrutiny. Such actions might result in internal departmental reviews, audits, or investigations by the relevant parliamentary committees or oversight bodies. While the Act itself does not prescribe maximum penalties, the broader legal and administrative frameworks governing public finance in Australia could impose disciplinary actions, financial penalties, or other corrective measures on individuals found to have acted improperly or without due process.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Finance & Banking Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Repeal & Amendment

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.