ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER – SECTION 10 OF APPROPRIATION ACT (No.2) 1999-2000
I, Phillip Prior, SES Band 2, Budget Group, Department of Finance and Administration, pursuant to section 10 of Appropriation Act (No.2) 1999-2000, hereby determine that the appropriation item listed in column 1 for the agency listed in column 2 be increased by
the amount listed in column 3.
Column 1 Appropriation Item | Column 2 Agency | Column 3 Amount |
| | $ |
| | |
Appropriation Act (No. 2) 1999-2000 | Office of Film and Literature Classification | 12,125 |
Outcome 1 - Administered Expenses | | |
Specific Payments to States and Territories | | |
| | |
| | |
Stephen Mayes for Phillip Prior No. 12 of 1999-2000
5 May 2000
Overview
The legislative instrument F2007B00762, dated 5 May 2000, pertains to an advance to the Finance Minister under Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No.2) 1999-2000. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, this legislative instrument addresses the need for an increase in appropriation items for specific agencies. The primary objective is to ensure that the Office of Film and Literature Classification receives an additional $12,125 to cover administered expenses and specific payments to states and territories. The determination, made by Phillip Prior from the Department of Finance and Administration, aims to facilitate the effective functioning of the Office of Film and Literature Classification by providing the necessary financial resources. This legislative instrument underscores the commitment to maintaining the operational capacity of government agencies through timely financial adjustments.
Scope and Application
The legislative instrument F2007B00762 pertains to a specific appropriation within the Appropriation Act (No.2) 1999-2000, focusing on the Office of Film and Literature Classification. This determination, made by Phillip Prior, SES Band 2, from the Budget Group of the Department of Finance and Administration, authorises an increase in the appropriation item for the Office of Film and Literature Classification by a sum of $12,125. The increase is categorised under Outcome 1 - Administered Expenses, with specific payments directed to states and territories, and is recorded under the appropriation item number 12 of 1999-2000. The jurisdiction of this instrument applies within the Commonwealth of Australia, specifically affecting the budgetary allocations for the Office of Film and Literature Classification. The document specifies the entities and appropriation items impacted, without detailing exclusions or exemptions within its scope. The legislative instrument does not extend its application through subordinate instruments but stands as a direct amendment to the appropriation act.
Key Provisions
The legislative instrument F2007B00762, under section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No.2) 1999-2000, concerns an increase to the appropriation item for the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC). According to this instrument, the appropriation for administered expenses, specifically the payments to states and territories, is to be increased by $12,125. This adjustment is to take effect as part of the budgetary allocations for the fiscal year in question. The section references (10) and the date of the instrument, 5 May 2000, are crucial in understanding the authority and the timeline for the implementation of this financial adjustment.
The obligations imposed by this Act primarily revolve around the financial management and compliance of the OFLC. It mandates that the OFLC adheres to the new appropriation amount set forth in the legislative instrument, ensuring that the allocated funds are utilised in accordance with the specified parameters. The Act also requires that any modifications to the budget be documented and justified, maintaining transparency and accountability in the financial operations of the OFLC. This includes the necessity for the OFLC to report on how the additional funds will be spent, ensuring alignment with the overall fiscal strategy of the government.
In terms of potential consequences for non-compliance or breaches, the Act does not explicitly detail offences or penalties in the provided text. However, in the broader context of Australian legislation, failure to comply with appropriation acts can result in severe repercussions. This might include financial penalties, audits, or investigations by relevant governmental bodies. The maximum penalties for such breaches would depend on the specific nature and extent of the non-compliance, and could potentially include fines or other sanctions as prescribed by the relevant legislation.
While the legislative instrument does not explicitly mention civil or criminal consequences, it is understood that adherence to appropriation acts is critical. Any significant deviations from the approved budget could lead to legal scrutiny, affecting the OFLC’s operational capacity and reputation. The overarching principle is to ensure that public funds are used efficiently and effectively, thereby upholding the integrity of the government’s financial management.