ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER – SECTION 10 OF APPROPRIATION ACT (No.1) 1999-2000
I, Phillip Prior, SES Band 2, Budget Group, Department of Finance and Administration, pursuant to section 10 of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000, hereby determine that the appropriation item listed in Column 1 for the agency listed in Column 2 be increased by the amount listed in Column 3.
Column 1 Appropriation Item | Column 2 Agency | Column 3 Amount |
| | $ |
| | |
Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000 | Australian Institute of Health and Welfare | 59,027 |
Departmental Outputs | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Phillip Prior No. 20 of 1999-2000
26 June 2000
Overview
The Legislative Instrument F2007B00769, issued under section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000, was enacted to address the need for adjustments to the appropriation items allocated to various agencies. This particular legislative instrument, issued by Phillip Prior of the Department of Finance and Administration, allows for the adjustment of appropriations for the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, increasing the allocated funds for Departmental Outputs by $59,027. The Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides the legal framework for the allocation and management of public funds, ensuring that government agencies have the necessary resources to carry out their functions. The policy objective of this specific legislative instrument is to ensure that the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare has sufficient funding to fulfil its mandated activities and outputs, thereby supporting the overall efficiency and effectiveness of government operations.
Scope and Application
Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000 applies to the allocation and modification of funds appropriated by the Commonwealth for specific entities within the government, particularly focusing on departmental outputs. This legislative instrument empowers the Finance Minister to adjust appropriation items for various agencies based on budgetary needs and priorities. The specified increase in appropriation for the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, as determined by Phillip Prior from the Department of Finance and Administration, is an example of such a modification. This adjustment ensures that the Institute can fulfil its mandated functions and objectives effectively within the fiscal year 1999-2000. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is limited to the Commonwealth level, and it does not specify any exclusions or exemptions within the context of this legislative instrument. The application of this Act may be further extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, which can provide additional details or specific conditions under which the appropriations can be modified.
Key Provisions
Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000 empowers the determination of appropriations, effectively allowing the reallocation of funds within specified limits. In this case, Section 10 is utilised by Phillip Prior, a member of the Department of Finance and Administration, to increase the appropriation for a specific item for the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. According to Column 1, the appropriation item in question is the 'Departmental Outputs'. The agency involved, listed in Column 2, is the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The amount of the increase, specified in Column 3, is $59,027.
The obligations imposed by this legislation on the relevant parties, notably Phillip Prior and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, include adherence to the outlined appropriation and the transparent documentation of the fund's reallocation. Phillip Prior, as an authorised official, must ensure that the increased appropriation is justified and complies with the requirements set forth in the Act. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, as the recipient of the increased appropriation, must utilise the funds in accordance with its approved budget and in alignment with the objectives for which the funds were originally allocated.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Act may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the legislation does not explicitly detail specific penalties for breaches, it is reasonable to infer that any unauthorised or unjustified appropriation adjustments could lead to legal repercussions. The maximum penalties for such breaches would likely be determined by the broader legal context in which this appropriation act operates, potentially including fines, imprisonment, or other administrative sanctions as prescribed by relevant legislation. It is essential for all parties involved to meticulously follow the legislative requirements to avoid any adverse legal outcomes.