ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER – SECTION 10 OF APPROPRIATION ACT (No.1) 1999-2000
I, Phillip Prior, SES Band 2, Budget Group, Department of Finance and Administration, pursuant to Section 10 of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000, hereby determine that the appropriation item listed in Column 1 for the agency listed in Column 2 be increased by the amount listed in Column 3.
Column 1 Appropriation Item | Column 2 Agency | Column 3 Amount |
| | $ |
| | |
Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000 | Department of Finance and Administration | |
Administered Expenses – Outcome 2 | | 15,036,000 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Phillip Prior No.19a of 1999-2000
27 June 2000
Overview
The legislative instrument F2007B00828, titled "Advance to the Finance Minister – Section 10 of Appropriation Act (No.1) 1999-2000," was enacted in 1999 to address the need for additional funding within specific appropriation items for the financial year. This legislative instrument was created under the authority of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000, passed by the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective of ensuring that government agencies have the necessary resources to carry out their functions effectively. The instrument specifies an increase in funding for administered expenses for the Department of Finance and Administration, thereby facilitating the allocation of resources to support the outcomes outlined in the appropriation act for that financial year.
Scope and Application
Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 1999-2000, as applied by legislative instrument F2007B00828, pertains specifically to the re-allocation of funds within the Department of Finance and Administration. This particular legislative instrument authorises the Finance Minister to increase the appropriation for administered expenses associated with Outcome 2 by the sum of $15,036,000. The legislation directly applies to the Department of Finance and Administration, targeting the specified appropriation item to address administrative expenses. The jurisdictional reach of this Act is limited to the Commonwealth level, with the adjustments made under the purview of the federal government’s fiscal framework. No explicit exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are stated in the primary text, though it is likely that other regulations or subordinate instruments may further define or restrict the application of these funds. This legislative instrument does not extend the scope beyond the specified appropriation item and agency, maintaining a narrow focus on budgetary reallocations within the stipulated parameters.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the legislative instrument (F2007B00828) detail the adjustment of appropriation items for specific agencies. Section 10 of the Appropriation Act (No.1) 1999-2000 permits the Finance Minister to increase certain appropriation items as authorised. In this case, Phillip Prior, a SES Band 2 officer from the Budget Group within the Department of Finance and Administration, is the individual authorised to make these adjustments. Specifically, Phillip Prior has determined that the appropriation item for "Administered Expenses – Outcome 2" for the Department of Finance and Administration should be increased by $15,036,000, as per the details outlined in the table in the document.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the relevant parties involve ensuring that the specified appropriation adjustments are accurately made and documented. Phillip Prior, as the authorised officer, must verify that the appropriation item increase is correctly applied within the confines of the law. This includes maintaining proper records and ensuring that the increase aligns with the budgetary framework and fiscal policies in place for the financial year 1999-2000. The Department of Finance and Administration is also responsible for ensuring that the additional funds are used appropriately and in accordance with the intended outcomes specified in the appropriation act.
Breaches of the provisions outlined in this Act can lead to both civil and criminal consequences, depending on the nature and intent of the breach. For instance, if an officer like Phillip Prior were to improperly adjust appropriation items without the necessary authority or in a manner inconsistent with the Act, this could result in disciplinary action, potential civil penalties, or even criminal charges. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the text, such breaches could lead to fines, imprisonment, or other legal repercussions as stipulated under the broader legislative framework governing public finance and budget management in Australia.