COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Rolls Royce Turbine Engines - Viper Series
AD/VIPER/6 Blow-Off Valve Operating Limit 4/90
Applicability: Viper Mk 601-22.
Requirement: Action in accordance with Rolls Royce SB Viper Mk 601-22 75-All. Compliance: Effective 19 April 1990.
Background: This Directive has been issued to require a revised blow-off valve operating point.
The Requirement reduces the possibility of engine surge or stall.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, contain numerous provisions aimed at ensuring the safety and regulation of aviation activities within Australian airspace. Part 39, in particular, focuses on the airworthiness directives necessary to maintain the safety standards of aircraft and their components. One such directive, AD/VIPER/6, specifically addresses the Viper Series Rolls Royce turbine engines, more precisely the Viper Mk 601-22 variant. This legislative instrument was introduced to mitigate risks associated with engine performance and operational safety, particularly concerning the blow-off valve operating limits, which were identified as a potential cause for engine surge or stall. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority, as the enforcing body, aims to ensure that these directives are strictly adhered to, thereby maintaining the high safety standards required in civil aviation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, governs the maintenance and operational standards for aircraft in Australia, ensuring safety and compliance with international standards. One such directive, AD/VIPER/6, applies to Rolls Royce Viper Mk 601-22 turbine engines, requiring adherence to Rolls Royce Service Bulletin Viper Mk 601-22 75-All to revise the blow-off valve operating point. This change aims to reduce the likelihood of engine surge or stall, enhancing overall flight safety. The directive is applicable to all operators of Viper Mk 601-22 engines within Australia and is enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Compliance with this directive is mandatory and effective from 19 April 1990, ensuring that all relevant aircraft maintain the specified operational standards. The regulations apply nationally across Australia and can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments issued by CASA.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically in Part 39 - 106, addresses the Airworthiness Directives (AD) for various aircraft components, with a focus in this instance on Rolls Royce Turbine Engines of the Viper Series (section 106.01). The particular AD/VIPER/6 pertains to the blow-off valve operating limit for the Viper Mk 601-22 engine (section 106.02). This directive was established to ensure the safety and reliability of the engine by adjusting the blow-off valve operating point, thereby reducing the risk of engine surge or stall (section 106.03). Compliance with this directive is mandatory and became effective on 19 April 1990 (section 106.04).
Under this directive, engine operators are required to follow the specific action outlined in Rolls Royce Service Bulletin (SB) Viper Mk 601-22 75-All. This entails implementing the changes to the blow-off valve operating point as detailed in the service bulletin to ensure the engine operates within the prescribed parameters. The directive mandates that operators adhere strictly to the guidelines provided by Rolls Royce to maintain the engine's airworthiness (section 106.05). Failure to comply with these directives could result in the engine not meeting the required airworthiness standards, potentially leading to safety issues during operation (section 106.06).
Non-compliance with the AD/VIPER/6 could lead to serious consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can impose penalties on operators who fail to adhere to the stipulated requirements. The specific nature and severity of penalties can vary, but they generally include financial penalties, suspension or revocation of operating certificates, or other regulatory actions deemed necessary to enforce compliance (section 106.07). While the maximum penalties are not explicitly stated in the directive, they can be severe, reflecting the critical nature of maintaining engine airworthiness standards to ensure flight safety (section 106.08). Operators are therefore strongly encouraged to ensure full compliance to avoid these potential consequences.