COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Aerospatiale (Socata) TBM 700 Series Aeroplanes
AD/TBM 700/26 Nose Wheel Tyre 7/2001
Applicability: TBM 700 aircraft, serial numbers 1 through 164, 166 through 173, 175 through 177,
and 179 through 181.
Requirement: Action in accordance with Socata Service Bulletin 70-089-32.
Note: DGAC AD 2001-003(A) refers.
Compliance: Unless already accomplished, at the next scheduled inspection after 19 July 2001, or before 31 August 2001, whichever occurs first.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 12 July 2001.
Background: The manufacturer has determined that some aircraft may have been delivered with an incorrect part number nose wheel tyre, and if not corrected, could lead to premature wear of the tread and body.
David Alan Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 1 June 2001
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 13 June 2001.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, encompass the regulatory framework governing civil aviation in Australia, with Part 39 specifically addressing Airworthiness Directives. One such directive, AD/TBM 700/26 issued in July 2001, pertains to the Aerospatiale (Socata) TBM 700 Series Aeroplanes. This directive was enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to address an identified safety issue concerning the nose wheel tyre of specified TBM 700 aircraft serial numbers. The potential problem, if unrectified, involved the risk of premature tyre wear, which could compromise the safety of the aircraft. The directive mandates corrective action in line with Socata Service Bulletin 70-089-32, with compliance required by a specified date following the AD's issuance. This legislative measure aims to ensure that the identified safety issue is promptly addressed, thereby maintaining the airworthiness of the affected aircraft.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105, governs the safety standards for aeronautical products and aircraft within Australia, with this particular Airworthiness Directive (AD) targeting Aerospatiale (Socata) TBM 700 Series aeroplanes. The directive applies to specific serial numbers of the TBM 700 aircraft, namely those ranging from 1 through 164, 166 through 173, 175 through 177, and 179 through 181. This regulatory mandate issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority of subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998, is aimed at rectifying an identified unsafe condition related to the nose wheel tyre of these aircraft models. The directive requires compliance with Socata Service Bulletin 70-089-32 and mandates that the corrective action be undertaken during the next scheduled inspection following 19 July 2001, or by 31 August 2001 at the latest. Failure to comply with this directive could result in unsafe operating conditions, specifically premature wear of the tyre tread and body, potentially leading to more severe mechanical failures.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) in Part 39, under the section concerning Airworthiness Directives, mandates specific actions to ensure the safety of certain aircraft. In this instance, Airworthiness Directive AD/TBM 700/26 pertains to the Aerospatiale (Socata) TBM 700 Series Aeroplanes. The directive specifically addresses nose wheel tyres that may have been incorrectly installed. The applicability section of the AD (section 1) clearly outlines that the directive applies to TBM 700 aircraft with certain serial numbers. The requirement section (section 2) stipulates that corrective action must be taken in accordance with Socata Service Bulletin 70-089-32. This involves ensuring the correct part number for the nose wheel tyre is installed to prevent premature wear of the tread and body.
The AD imposes several obligations on the parties governed by it. Primarily, it requires aircraft owners or operators to comply with the specified requirements within a defined timeframe. Specifically, the directive mandates that the corrective action outlined in the Socata Service Bulletin must be undertaken at the next scheduled inspection following 19 July 2001, or before 31 August 2001, whichever comes first. This directive is effective from 12 July 2001, as stated in the compliance section (section 3), ensuring that any non-compliance risks the safety of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the AD can have serious consequences. The AD does not explicitly mention any penalties, but the potential ramifications of not adhering to the directive could include grounding of the aircraft, which may result in substantial operational disruptions and financial loss. Additionally, not complying with the AD could lead to severe safety issues, including the risk of tyre failure during operation, which could result in accidents. While specific penalties are not outlined, the overarching aim of the AD is to ensure compliance to maintain airworthiness and safety standards.
In summary, the AD sets out a clear requirement for specific corrective action on the nose wheel tyres of Aerospatiale (Socata) TBM 700 Series Aeroplanes to prevent unsafe conditions. It imposes a mandatory compliance timeframe on aircraft owners or operators, with the directive becoming effective from 12 July 2001. Non-compliance could lead to significant operational and safety risks, even though specific penalties are not detailed in the directive itself.