AD/TAY/2 Amdt 2 - Fan Blade Root - Inspection

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B07263 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE


For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/TAY/2 Amdt 1 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.


 

Rolls Royce Turbine Engines - Tay Series

 

AD/TAY/2

Amdt 2


Fan Blade Root - Inspection 3/2004

 

 

Applicability: Rolls Royce Tay 611-8, 620-15, 620-15/20, 650-15, 650-15/10 and 651-54 model engines.

 

Requirement: Perform ultrasonic inspection on the LP compressor rotor blades per Rolls Royce SB TAY 72-1442 Revision 3.

 

Note: LBA AD D-1998-055R3 refers. CASA AD/TAY/9 incorporates other requirements of the LBA AD.

 

Compliance: Unless previously accomplished, in accordance with the requirement document from the effective date of this Directive.

 

This Amendment becomes effective on 18 March 2004.

 

Background: A Tay 650 LP compressor fan blade set failed due to cracking initiated in the blade root. Rolls Royce have developed an ultrasonic inspection procedure to detect this crack initiation and is mandated by this Directive.

 

This amendment changes the revision status of the requirement document which includes changes to the inspection interval and extends the applicability per the requirements of the LBA AD.

 

Amdt 1 of this Directive became effective on 15 June 2000.

 

The original issue of this Directive became effective on 28 January 1999.


James Coyne

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 5 February 2004

 

 

 

The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 25 February 2004.

 

 


Page 1 of 1

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 106, outlines directives for maintaining the airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products in Australia. Enacted by the Australian Government, this legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent safety measures in the aviation industry, ensuring that aircraft and their components meet necessary safety standards to prevent accidents and ensure public safety. The objective of these regulations is to mandate actions that correct any unsafe conditions identified in aircraft and aeronautical products, thereby maintaining a high level of safety within the aviation sector. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is the enforcing body, with a mandate to issue and revoke airworthiness directives as required to manage and mitigate risks associated with aviation safety.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 106, issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), sets forth Airworthiness Directives that are applicable to certain aircraft and aeronautical products within the Australian jurisdiction. One such directive, AD/TAY/2 Amdt 2, pertains to the Rolls Royce Tay Series turbine engines, namely the Tay 611-8, 620-15, 620-15/20, 650-15, 650-15/10, and 651-54 models. This directive mandates an ultrasonic inspection of the low-pressure compressor rotor blades in accordance with the requirements outlined by Rolls Royce SB TAY 72-1442 Revision 3. The directive aims to address a previously identified unsafe condition where a blade root failure in a Tay 650 engine led to cracking, and requires compliance from the date of the directive's effective issuance. The directive extends to any person or entity operating such engines within Australia and supersedes the previously issued AD/TAY/2 Amdt 1, effective from 18 March 2004. The regulation may also incorporate other requirements from relevant LBA Airworthiness Directives, as noted in CASA AD/TAY/9, thereby ensuring that all applicable safety standards are met.

Key Provisions

The Airworthiness Directive AD/TAY/2 Amdt 2 (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) applies specifically to Rolls Royce Tay 611-8, 620-15, 620-15/20, 650-15, 650-15/10, and 651-54 model engines. The AD mandates that an ultrasonic inspection be performed on the LP compressor rotor blades in accordance with Rolls Royce SB TAY 72-1442 Revision 3. This requirement is designed to address the issue of cracking at the blade roots, as evidenced by a previous failure of a Tay 650 LP compressor fan blade set. The AD specifies that the inspection must be carried out unless it has already been performed, and it must adhere to the instructions outlined in the requirement document, effective from the date of the directive. Entities governed by this AD are required to ensure that the specified engines undergo the mandated ultrasonic inspection. This obligation extends to operators and owners of aircraft equipped with the identified Rolls Royce engine models. The AD also references LBA AD D-1998-055R3, indicating that other requirements are incorporated by CASA AD/TAY/9. Compliance with this AD is mandatory, and failure to adhere to the specified inspection procedures can result in significant safety risks, potentially compromising the airworthiness of the aircraft. Violations of the requirements set forth in this Airworthiness Directive may lead to enforcement actions under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth). Specifically, non-compliance with ADs is considered an offence under section 62 of the Act, which can result in substantial penalties. The maximum penalty for an individual is a fine of up to $21,000 or imprisonment for up to two years, or both. For corporations, the penalty can be even higher, with fines reaching up to $1,050,000 or more, depending on the severity and impact of the breach. These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the AD to maintain the safety standards required by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.