CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
CASA raised AD/SUPP/22 to correct an unsafe situation on all helicopters fitted with a rescue hoist and a D-Lok hook. An unauthorised change made by the hook manufacturer resulted in substandard parts being fitted to some hoists. The European Aviation Safety Agency raised an AD covering helicopters of European origin, but the US FAA has yet to act. CASA raised an AD to correct the problem on all Australian helicopters, not just those of European origin. EASA has now amended their AD to require that defective hooks be returned to the hoist manufacturer, so AD/SUPP/22 has been further amended to reflect this change. AD/SUPP/22 Amendment 2 will become effective on 24 September 2009, and cancels and replaces the previous issue.
CASA has not consulted with the Australian industry and public because of the consequences of failure and the resultant urgency of need for action. The burden imposed by this change is very minor, and only a small number of aircraft are likely to be immediately effected by this directive.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Initial Airworthiness in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, serves as a foundational piece of legislation aimed at ensuring the safety of air navigation within Australia. This Act empowers the Governor-General to create regulations necessary for the safety of air navigation, and it provides the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) with the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) concerning specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. The ADs, which are legislative instruments, are issued to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, a responsibility that rests with the State of Registry in accordance with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). CASA issued AD/SUPP/22 to address an unsafe condition on helicopters equipped with a rescue hoist and a D-Lok hook, where substandard parts were inadvertently installed due to an unauthorised change by the hook manufacturer. This urgent action was taken without prior consultation with the industry and public, given the immediate need to rectify the safety issue. The policy objective is to maintain and enhance aviation safety standards by promptly addressing identified hazards through the issuance of appropriate directives.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation (Airworthiness) Regulations 1998, under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure the safety of air navigation. These ADs, which are legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, mandate specific actions or requirements for maintaining the airworthiness of aircraft, and are aligned with international standards as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Design, typically the aircraft manufacturer, is responsible for providing necessary information to maintain airworthiness, while the State of Registry, such as CASA in Australia, ensures that these directives are implemented effectively on aircraft registered within their jurisdiction. CASA issued AD/SUPP/22 to address an unsafe condition found in helicopters fitted with a rescue hoist and a D-Lok hook, following an unauthorised change by the hook manufacturer that led to substandard parts. This AD applies to all helicopters registered in Australia, regardless of origin, and aims to rectify the issue promptly. While the AD was enacted without public consultation due to the urgency of the situation, its impact is minimal as only a small number of aircraft are likely to be immediately affected. The AD reflects subsequent amendments made by the European Aviation Safety Agency and will become effective on 24 September 2009, cancelling and replacing the previous directive.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically under regulation 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) concerning certain types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are essential tools to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with international standards set forth by Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 allows the Governor-General to make these regulations to safeguard air navigation. Furthermore, subregulation 39.001(5) clarifies that an AD is a disallowable instrument, thus categorising it as a legislative instrument under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Under these regulations, both the State of Design and the State of Registry bear significant responsibilities. The State of Design is tasked with ensuring the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to the States of Registry. Meanwhile, the State of Registry, which in Australia is CASA, must develop or adopt requirements to maintain airworthiness. When an AD is issued by the State of Design, CASA must evaluate the information and, if necessary, issue a corresponding Australian AD to enforce the requirements on all relevant aircraft within Australia’s jurisdiction.
CASA issued AD/SUPP/22 to address an unsafe situation concerning helicopters equipped with a rescue hoist and a D-Lok hook. An unauthorised modification by the hook manufacturer led to the installation of substandard parts on some hoists. While the European Aviation Safety Agency had already issued a related AD for helicopters of European origin, CASA opted to issue an AD applicable to all Australian helicopters, not limited to those of European origin. Subsequently, EASA updated their AD to mandate the return of defective hooks to the hoist manufacturer, prompting CASA to amend AD/SUPP/22 accordingly. The latest amendment, AD/SUPP/22 Amendment 2, will take effect on 24 September 2009, superseding the previous version.
CASA did not engage in consultation with the Australian industry and public due to the urgent need to address the safety issue. The regulatory burden imposed by this directive is minimal, and only a small number of aircraft are likely to be immediately affected. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that such ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The directive was issued by the Manager, Initial Airworthiness in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch of CASA, in compliance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act.