COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Supplementary Equipment
AD/SUPP/17
Amdt 1
Lucas Air Equipment Rescue Hoists - Up Limit Position Security
9/97
Applicability: LUCAS AIR EQUIPMENT electric hoists P/N 76375-030, -130, 76378 and 76378-
100 equipped with electronic control boxes P/N 61148-001, -002 and -006 and are installed on, but not limited to, the EUROCOPTER Helicopters; SA 360, SA 365 and SA 565 series.
Requirement: 1. Visually inspect the cable and blank of the electronic control box upper vent in accordance with LUCAS AIR EQUIPMENT Service Telex 61148-25-CW-01 Issue 1 dated 26 April 1994, paras 1 and 2.
2. Carry out the end of travel procedure described in LUCAS AIR EQUIPMENT Service Telex 61148-25-CW-01 Issue 1 dated 26 April 1994 Para 3.
- If, for any reason, the hook comes fully home at an uncontrolled speed, the hoist assembly (hoist and control box) must be removed from the helicopter for maintenance by an authorised repair facility.
b. In the case of uncontrolled speed variation or absence of automatic speed reduction, contact the manufacturer for further instructions.
3. The incorporation of the following service bulletins on the electric hoist and on the electronic control box is terminating action for this airworthiness directive:
Electric Hoist
Part Number Applicable Service Bulletin
76375-030, 76375-130 SB 25-69-0Y
76378, 76378-100 SB 76378-25-03
Electronic Control Box
Part Number Applicable Service Bulletin
61148-002 SB 61148-25-01 Issue 2
61148-006 SB 61148-25-02 Issue 2
Note: DGAC AD 94-116(AB)R1 refers.
Compliance: For Requirement 1, before first use of hoist after 18 May 1994.
For Requirement 2, during each hoisting operation. For Requirement 3, at operators discretion.
The effective date of the original AD was 18 May 1994.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
This airworthiness directive becomes effective on 14 August 1997.
Background: DGAC have advised that several incidents, caused by dynamic overloading on winding up limit, due to uncontrolled or excessive speed of the cable normally regulated by the automatic speed reducing mechanism or the operator, have been recorded. These incidents could cause the breaking of the cable.
The AD has been amended in response to a revision by the DGAC and includes both an ongoing inspection and terminating action.
The original issue of this airworthiness directive became effective on 18 May 1994.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended through various legislative instruments such as F2006B07144, address a critical gap in ensuring the safety of helicopter operations by issuing specific airworthiness directives. These directives are enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), the relevant body responsible for the regulation and oversight of civil aviation in Australia. The policy objective behind these regulations is to maintain the highest safety standards in the aviation industry by mitigating risks associated with mechanical failures, particularly those that could lead to catastrophic incidents during hoisting operations. One such airworthiness directive, AD/SUPP/17, specifically targets Lucas Air Equipment rescue hoists, highlighting the need for stringent inspection and maintenance procedures to prevent uncontrolled speed variations that could result in cable failure. This directive aims to ensure that operators and maintenance personnel adhere to prescribed safety protocols to maintain the airworthiness of the equipment involved.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 107 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, govern the airworthiness of certain aircraft equipment, including rescue hoists. This legislation applies to LUCAS AIR EQUIPMENT electric hoists, specifically those with part numbers 76375-030, -130, 76378, and 76378-100, equipped with electronic control boxes part numbers 61148-001, -002, and -006, and installed on EUROCOPTER Helicopters, such as the SA 360, SA 365, and SA 565 series. The directive mandates specific maintenance actions to ensure safety, including visual inspection of the hoist's cable and blank, as well as adherence to certain procedures and service bulletins. Compliance with these directives is required before the first use of the hoist after 18 May 1994, during each hoisting operation, and at the operator's discretion for incorporating specified service bulletins. The regulations extend to the Commonwealth level, overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, ensuring a national standard for airworthiness and safety in helicopter operations.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically in PART 39 - 107 under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, outlines detailed requirements for LUCAS Air Equipment rescue hoists. This directive applies to certain hoists and electronic control boxes installed on specific Eurocopter helicopters (Section 1). Requirement 1 mandates a visual inspection of the cable and blank of the electronic control box upper vent, following specific instructions from a service telex issued on 26 April 1994 (Section 1(1)). Requirement 2 requires the end of travel procedure to be carried out during each hoisting operation as described in the same telex (Section 1(2)). Requirement 3 necessitates the incorporation of specified service bulletins for the hoist and electronic control box, with compliance at the operator's discretion (Section 1(3)).
The obligations imposed by this directive include conducting a thorough inspection of the hoist and electronic control box before the first use of the hoist after 18 May 1994, performing the end of travel procedure during each hoisting operation, and ensuring the incorporation of the relevant service bulletins at the operator's discretion (Section 1). These requirements are designed to ensure the safe operation of the hoist and to prevent incidents of dynamic overloading or uncontrolled speed variations that could lead to cable failure.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this airworthiness directive may result in serious safety issues, including the risk of uncontrolled speed variations or absence of automatic speed reduction, which could lead to cable breakage and compromise the safety of the hoisting operation. The consequences of non-compliance could be severe, including potential grounding of the helicopter and possible legal repercussions for the operators. The maximum penalties for breaches of civil aviation safety regulations are not specified in the text but can include fines and other enforcement actions as outlined in relevant civil aviation legislation.