AD/S-PUMA/25 Amdt 1 - Cockpit Doors Hinge Tenons

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B07102 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters

 

AD/S-PUMA/25

Amdt 1


Cockpit Doors Hinge Tenons 12/97

 

Applicability: Models AS 332C, C1, L, L1, and L2.

 

Requirement: Action in accordance with Eurocopter France AS 332 Service Bulletin 01.00.50.

 

Note: DGAC ADs 97-109-061(AB) R1 and 97-108-006(AB) R1 refer.

 

Compliance: 1. Inspect within 50 hours time in service after 21 May 1997, or before 13 June 1997, whichever occurs first,

 

2. Replace all uncracked hinge tenons with new items within 500 hours time in service after 21 May 1997.

 

The compliance of the initial issue of this directive remains unchanged. This amendment becomes effective on 6 November 1997.

Background: There were reports of cockpit door hinge failures that were attributed to incorrect shimming of the hinge tenons.

 

Amendment 1 is issued in response to a revision of the related DGAC ADs which introduce a service bulletin as the new requirement document.

 

The original issue of this airworthiness directive became effective on 21 May 1997.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Parliament, form a crucial part of the legislative framework governing civil aviation safety within Australia. Part 39, which pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, includes the AD/S-PUMA/25 Amendment 1, specifically targeting Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters. This directive addresses issues related to the cockpit door hinge tenons, which were reported to have failed due to incorrect shimming. The directive aims to enhance safety by requiring inspections and replacements of these hinge tenons in specified models within defined timeframes. This legislative measure was introduced to ensure that any potential defects are identified and rectified promptly, thereby mitigating risks associated with cockpit door failures. The policy objective is to maintain high standards of airworthiness and safety for aircraft operating under Australian jurisdiction.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, encompasses the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, which apply to various aircraft, including the Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) series helicopters. This particular directive, AD/S-PUMA/25 Amendment 1, applies to models AS 332C, C1, L, L1, and L2. The directive mandates actions as outlined in Eurocopter France AS 332 Service Bulletin 01.00.50, responding to previous issues related to cockpit door hinge failures due to incorrect shimming of the hinge tenons. Compliance with this directive requires inspections within a specific timeframe and replacement of uncracked hinge tenons within a defined operational period. The directive's geographic reach is national, as it applies to all aircraft registered and operating within Australia, governed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. There are no exclusions or exemptions specified within the directive, implying that all applicable aircraft must adhere to the outlined requirements. Any further specification or extension of the directive's application can be managed through subordinate instruments issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, Part 39 - 105, pertains to the safety and airworthiness of aircraft, specifically addressing the Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters. This directive, identified as AD/S-PUMA/25 Amendment 1, focuses on cockpit door hinge tenons and mandates compliance with Eurocopter France’s Service Bulletin 01.00.50. The applicability of this directive extends to models AS 332C, C1, L, L1, and L2, ensuring that these aircraft maintain specific safety standards. The directive requires an initial inspection of the cockpit doors within 50 hours of time in service after 21 May 1997, or before 13 June 1997, whichever comes first. Furthermore, it mandates the replacement of all uncracked hinge tenons within 500 hours of time in service following 21 May 1997. These actions are to be taken in accordance with the aforementioned service bulletin and reference previous DGAC ADs 97-109-061(AB) R1 and 97-108-006(AB) R1. Operators and owners of the specified Eurocopter AS 332 models must ensure that their helicopters comply with these requirements. This includes conducting the necessary inspections and replacements as outlined in the directive. Failure to comply with these airworthiness directives could result in non-compliance with regulatory standards, potentially impacting the safety and airworthiness certification of the aircraft. The Civil Aviation Regulations impose significant obligations on the operators and owners of the affected helicopters. They must conduct the specified inspections and repairs in a timely manner to avoid any risk to flight safety. Non-compliance with these directives may lead to enforcement actions, which could include grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved. The directive underscores the importance of adhering to manufacturer service bulletins and regulatory amendments to maintain the highest safety standards in aviation. In the event of a breach of these regulations, there may be significant civil and criminal consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to impose penalties, including fines and potential suspension or revocation of airworthiness certificates. The severity of the penalty depends on the nature and extent of the non-compliance, with maximum penalties outlined in the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Ensuring adherence to these directives is therefore crucial to avoid any adverse legal or operational consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.