COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters
AD/S-PUMA/2 Main Rotor Head - Sleeves 2/91
Applicability: Versions C, C1, L and L1 which are fitted with main rotor head sleeve P/N 330A31 1376.04 or 330A31 1376.16.
Requirement: Action in accordance with the technical requirements of DGAC AD 86-121-025(B) Revision 1, dated 19 September 1990.
Note: Aerospatiale AS 332 SB No 05.09 R3.
Compliance: In accordance with the Requirement Document.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under the authority of the Australian Parliament, were enacted to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. One specific legislative instrument, F2006B07097, was introduced to address issues concerning the airworthiness of certain Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters. This legislative instrument, issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), aims to maintain the highest standards of safety in aviation by issuing airworthiness directives. The particular directive, AD/S-PUMA/2, pertains to the main rotor head sleeves of the mentioned helicopter versions, ensuring they meet specific technical requirements as outlined in DGAC AD 86-121-025(B) Revision 1, dated 19 September 1990. Compliance with this directive is mandatory to ensure the continued safe operation of these aircraft.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105 concerning the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, applies to Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters, namely versions C, C1, L, and L1, which are equipped with a main rotor head sleeve bearing part numbers 330A31 1376.04 or 330A31 1376.16. The regulations mandate compliance with the technical requirements outlined in DGAC AD 86-121-025(B) Revision 1, dated 19 September 1990. This legislation extends across the Commonwealth of Australia and is applicable to any person or entity operating within its jurisdiction. Compliance is to be ensured by adhering to the requirements detailed in the Requirement Document, and failure to comply may result in penalties or other legal consequences. The regulations may be extended or further detailed through subordinate instruments, ensuring that the safety and operational standards are consistently met across the aviation sector.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, Section 105, establish critical provisions regarding the airworthiness directives for certain helicopter models. One such directive, AD/S-PUMA/2, pertains to the main rotor head sleeves of Eurocopter AS 332 (Super Puma) Series Helicopters, particularly those identified as versions C, C1, L, and L1, which are equipped with main rotor head sleeve parts numbered 330A31 1376.04 or 330A31 1376.16 (subsection 1). This directive requires operators to take specific actions in accordance with the technical requirements outlined in DGAC AD 86-121-025(B) Revision 1, dated 19 September 1990 (subsection 2). This requirement ensures that the specified helicopter models adhere to safety standards and maintain operational integrity.
Operators of the affected helicopters must ensure compliance with the directive by following the technical requirements detailed in DGAC AD 86-121-025(B) Revision 1. This involves adhering to the specific procedures and guidelines set forth in the requirement document to address any issues with the main rotor head sleeves. Non-compliance with these directives could result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which would prevent the operator from legally flying the helicopter until the necessary actions have been taken to rectify any identified issues (subsection 3).
Failure to comply with the airworthiness directive AD/S-PUMA/2 could result in severe consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may impose penalties for non-compliance, which can include both civil and criminal sanctions. Depending on the severity of the breach and the impact on aviation safety, penalties may range from fines to more severe sanctions such as grounding the aircraft or even revocation of the operator's licence. The specific penalties are outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations, but they are designed to ensure that all operators adhere strictly to the safety directives to protect both the aircraft and those on board (subsection 4).