CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority or its predecessors issued AD/S-76/13 affecting Sikorsky S-76 series Helicopters. CASA has assessed this AD and as a result has cancelled Australian AD/S-76/13. The cancellation will become effective on
2 July 2009. No replacement AD is required, as the unsafe condition no longer exists.
As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframe and Structures, in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 is an Australian Act of Parliament that was enacted to provide for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, with a focus on ensuring the safety of air navigation. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act, particularly to enhance the safety of air navigation. Under the Act, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were also established to provide further detail on the regulatory framework governing civil aviation in Australia. Regulation 39.001 of these regulations allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for particular kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products, with such directives being legislative instruments that can be disallowed under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The objective of these ADs is to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types and individual aircraft, in line with Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and its Annexes.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, supplemented by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, establishes the framework within which the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can issue airworthiness directives (ADs) to ensure the safety of air navigation. These regulations apply to aircraft and aeronautical products, encompassing all types of aircraft registered in Australia and their components. CASA's authority to issue ADs stems from regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which mandates that these directives must be issued to maintain airworthiness. Such ADs are legislative instruments subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and are regulated by the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The scope of these directives is further defined by Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which places the responsibility for continuing airworthiness on the State of Design and the State of Registry. CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must assess and, if necessary, issue Australian ADs to align with international standards and obligations. For instance, CASA issued and subsequently cancelled AD/S-76/13 for Sikorsky S-76 series helicopters, reflecting Australia's adherence to international civil aviation conventions. This cancellation was made without public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, in section 98, provides the authority for the Governor-General to enact regulations that ensure the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are intended to ensure the safety and airworthiness of aircraft, and under subregulation 39.001(5), they are considered disallowable instruments under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. As a result, ADs are legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This means that ADs carry the force of law and must be adhered to by the relevant parties.
The obligations imposed by these regulations primarily fall on CASA, which is tasked with the responsibility of issuing ADs when necessary. CASA must assess information from the State of Design, which has the primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and issue corresponding ADs if required. The State of Registry, where the aircraft is registered, is also responsible for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft within its jurisdiction. This involves developing or adopting requirements that align with international standards as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
In the specific case of Sikorsky S-76 series Helicopters, CASA issued AD/S-76/13, which has now been cancelled. This cancellation, effective from 2 July 2009, was made due to Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, and no replacement AD is required because the unsafe condition no longer exists. This decision was made by the Manager, Airframe and Structures, in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act.
For breaches of the regulations or ADs, various penalties and consequences may apply. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the provided text, it is understood that non-compliance with ADs could result in both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties could include fines and other monetary sanctions, while criminal penalties might involve imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness of ensuring air navigation safety. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach.