COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Rotax Piston Engines
AD/ROTAX/3 Ignition Electronic Module Wiring 5/95 DM
Applicability: All 912 A series engines from serial number 4,076.064.
Requirement: Action in accordance with Bombardier Rotax Mandatory Technical Bulletin 912-07 dated 30 January 1995.
Note: Austro Control (Austria) AD 82 dated 3 February 1995 refers.
Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 15 March 1995, but no later than 30 April 1995.
Background: Bombardier Rotax have reported that electromagnetic interference (EMI) from radio transmitters could cause ignition failure due to inadequate grounding. This Directive introduces new requirements to ensure that cable shields are correctly grounded, the Austrian compliance is extended by 45 days for Australian registered aircraft.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, was enacted to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework governing civil aviation safety in Australia. This legislation was introduced to address the need for maintaining airworthiness standards and ensuring the safety of aviation operations within the country. The policy objective of this regulatory framework is to safeguard the integrity and safety of civil aviation through rigorous compliance and adherence to directives. In the context of the Rotax Piston Engines, the Airworthiness Directive AD/ROTAX/3 aims to mitigate the risk of ignition failure due to electromagnetic interference by enforcing the grounding of cable shields, as outlined in Bombardier Rotax Mandatory Technical Bulletin 912-07. Compliance with these directives is mandated within a specified timeframe to ensure that Australian registered aircraft maintain their airworthiness and operational safety.
The enacting body responsible for these regulations is the Australian Parliament, which established the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to oversee and enforce these standards. This legislative instrument, AD/ROTAX/3, serves as a critical directive under the broader Civil Aviation Regulations, ensuring that aircraft utilising Rotax engines comply with necessary safety measures to prevent potential hazards arising from electromagnetic interference. The requirement for Australian registered aircraft to adhere to these directives underscores the commitment to maintaining high safety standards in line with international benchmarks.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, addresses the safety requirements for aircraft engines. This particular directive, AD/ROTAX/3, pertains to the ignition electronic module wiring of Rotax piston engines in the 912 A series, specifically those with serial numbers from 4,076.064 onwards. The directive mandates compliance with Bombardier Rotax’s Mandatory Technical Bulletin 912-07 dated 30 January 1995, which aims to mitigate risks of ignition failure due to electromagnetic interference from radio transmitters. Australian registered aircraft are required to adhere to the compliance timeline set out in this directive, which stipulates that the necessary actions must be taken within 100 hours of the engine's time in service after 15 March 1995, but no later than 30 April 1995. This ensures that all affected aircraft maintain the required safety standards to prevent potential hazards associated with engine failures.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under Part 39, specifically in section 106, addresses the safety directives concerning the airworthiness of Rotax piston engines. Section AD/ROTAX/3 focuses on ignition electronic module wiring for all 912 A series engines from serial number 4,076.064. The requirement here is to adhere to Bombardier Rotax Mandatory Technical Bulletin 912-07 dated 30 January 1995. This technical bulletin provides detailed instructions on how to address the electromagnetic interference (EMI) issue that may cause ignition failure due to inadequate grounding. This is particularly relevant as EMI from radio transmitters could compromise engine performance and safety. Austro Control in Austria issued AD 82 dated 3 February 1995, which the Australian directive references.
Compliance with this directive is mandatory, requiring action within 100 hours of time in service after 15 March 1995, but no later than 30 April 1995. This timeline ensures that all relevant aircraft are inspected and modified as necessary to meet the new safety standards. Owners and operators of the affected aircraft must ensure that the specified modifications are carried out by qualified personnel, and that all relevant documentation is maintained and available for inspection by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The compliance period extends the Austrian directive by 45 days, allowing Australian registered aircraft additional time to implement the necessary changes.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this airworthiness directive can lead to serious safety issues, including potential engine failure during flight. The regulations impose clear obligations on aircraft owners and operators to ensure that their aircraft meet the specified safety standards. Non-compliance can result in severe consequences, including grounding of the aircraft until the necessary modifications are completed, and potential legal repercussions. The stringent requirements underscore the importance of adhering to these directives to maintain the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft.
Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can result in both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines and the potential for the aircraft to be grounded, preventing it from operating until compliance is achieved. Additionally, individuals responsible for ensuring compliance, such as aircraft maintenance engineers or operators, may face personal fines and legal action. In severe cases, criminal charges may be brought against those who knowingly allow non-compliant aircraft to operate, leading to substantial fines and imprisonment. These consequences are intended to enforce strict adherence to safety regulations and ensure the highest standards of aviation safety are maintained.