COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Restraint Equipment
AD/RES/9 Unapproved Safety Belts and Harnesses - Removal From Service
10/75
Applicability: All safety belts and harnesses with release mechanisms whose locking action is achieved by the belt webbing being wedged by spring pressure between two metal parts, either of which is serrated or knurled.
Requirement: Remove from service. Compliance: Before 1 January 1977.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, constitute a comprehensive legal framework governing civil aviation safety in Australia, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Among these regulations is Part 39, which includes Airworthiness Directives (AD) aimed at ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft and related equipment. Specifically, AD/RES/9 focuses on the removal of unapproved safety belts and harnesses from service, which was enacted to address the safety risks associated with the use of such equipment. This directive applies to all safety belts and harnesses with release mechanisms that rely on the webbing being wedged by spring pressure between two metal parts, either of which is serrated or knurled. The policy objective behind this directive is to eliminate the use of potentially unsafe restraint equipment in aircraft, thereby enhancing passenger and crew safety. Compliance with this directive was required before 1 January 1977, ensuring that any unapproved safety belts and harnesses were removed from service well before this date.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39, mandates stringent safety standards for aviation equipment, with Airworthiness Directive AD/RES/9 focusing on the removal of unapproved safety belts and harnesses from service. This directive applies to all safety belts and harnesses featuring release mechanisms where the locking action relies on the belt webbing being wedged by spring pressure between two metal parts, at least one of which is serrated or knurled. The directive necessitates that such equipment be removed from service before 1 January 1977, ensuring that only approved and reliable safety equipment is used in aviation. The scope of this regulation is national, impacting all entities and industries within Australia’s civil aviation sector, thereby upholding safety standards across the Commonwealth. No exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are specified within this directive, and its application is enforced without the need for subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under Part 39, contains the Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically AD/RES/9, which addresses the removal from service of unapproved safety belts and harnesses. Section 10/75 focuses on safety belts and harnesses with release mechanisms that operate via the webbing being wedged by spring pressure between two metal parts, at least one of which is serrated or knurled. According to this directive, such equipment must be removed from service. This requirement was set to be complied with before 1 January 1977.
The Act imposes clear obligations on parties and entities involved in the aviation industry. Specifically, operators of aircraft must ensure that any safety belts and harnesses meeting the criteria outlined in AD/RES/9 are removed from service promptly. This involves identifying the specified equipment, ensuring its removal from use, and possibly replacing it with approved alternatives to maintain compliance with aviation safety standards. The directive underscores the importance of adhering to prescribed safety standards and mandates actions to be taken by those responsible for the safety equipment on aircraft.
Failure to comply with the provisions of AD/RES/9 can result in serious consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the excerpt, non-compliance with Civil Aviation Regulations can generally lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). These actions may include fines, enforcement notices, and in severe cases, prosecution. The severity of the penalty often depends on the nature and extent of the breach, as well as any resultant risk to aviation safety. Operators found in breach of such safety directives may also face reputational damage and potential grounding of their aircraft until compliance is achieved.