COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/RB211/27 Amdt 1 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Rolls Royce Turbine Engines - RB211 Series
AD/RB211/27
Amdt 2
LP Compressor Fan Blades 5/2002
Applicability: Rolls Royce RB211 – 524 G/H series engines as detailed in Rolls Royce SB RB.211-72-C818 Revision 6.
Requirement: Accomplish procedures per Rolls Royce SB RB.211-72-C818 Revision 6.
Note: UK CAA AD 007-10-99 refers.
Compliance: As detailed in the compliance section of the requirement document. This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 16 May 2002.
Background: This directive was issued to address loss of fan blades from an engine in-flight due to failure on the dovetail root bedding line. An ultrasonic inspection process is introduced for early detection of crack initiation. This amendment introduces an
in-situ inspection process.
Amendment 1 of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 14 June 2001. The original issue of this AD became effective on 7 September 2000.
Eugene Paul Holzapfel
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 2 April 2002
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 24 April 2002.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) were enacted to provide comprehensive regulations concerning the safety and operation of civil aviation in Australia, aiming to ensure the highest safety standards for the nation's airspace. One of the key components of these regulations is Part 39, which includes Airworthiness Directives (ADs) designed to address specific safety concerns and ensure compliance with safety standards. These ADs are issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which acts as the delegate of the Commonwealth of Australia. The policy objective behind these ADs is to proactively manage and mitigate risks associated with civil aviation, ensuring that all aircraft and aeronautical products meet the necessary safety standards to protect passengers, crew, and the general public.
One particular AD, AD/RB211/27 Amdt 2, was issued to address the problem of loss of fan blades from Rolls Royce RB211-524 G/H series engines due to failures at the dovetail root bedding line. This AD mandates specific inspection procedures, including the introduction of an ultrasonic inspection process for early detection of crack initiation, as well as an in-situ inspection process. The directive aims to correct the unsafe condition identified and was introduced to enhance the safety and reliability of the affected aircraft engines, thereby reducing the risk of in-flight failures.
Scope and Application
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) applies specifically to the Rolls Royce RB211-524 G/H series engines, as detailed in Rolls Royce Service Bulletin RB.211-72-C818 Revision 6. It is a legislative instrument issued under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) delegate, Eugene Paul Holzapfel, to ensure compliance with safety standards for civil aviation in Australia. The directive revokes an earlier version, AD/RB211/27 Amdt 1, and replaces it with AD/RB211/27 Amdt 2, which became effective on 16 May 2002. The directive mandates specific procedures, as outlined in the Rolls Royce Service Bulletin, to rectify an identified unsafe condition related to the loss of fan blades due to failure on the dovetail root bedding line. This requirement is to be carried out in accordance with the detailed instructions provided and within the timeframe stipulated in the compliance section. The AD is applicable within the national jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Australia and is intended to ensure the continued airworthiness of the specified aircraft engines, thus safeguarding civil aviation operations.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly Part 39, section 106, focus on the maintenance of airworthiness for aircraft and aeronautical products. Under this regulation, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to issue Airworthiness Directives (ADs) to ensure the safety of aircraft in operation. In the case of the Rolls Royce RB211 – 524 G/H series engines, the directive AD/RB211/27 Amdt 2, published on 5 May 2002, outlines specific requirements to mitigate the risk of fan blade loss due to failures in the dovetail root bedding line. These requirements mandate that the procedures outlined in Rolls Royce SB RB.211-72-C818 Revision 6 must be followed, which include conducting ultrasonic inspections to detect early signs of crack initiation and implementing an in-situ inspection process. This directive became effective on 16 May 2002, as stipulated in the compliance section of the requirement document.
The obligations imposed by this directive on the entities governed by it, such as aircraft operators and maintenance providers, are significant. They must ensure that the specified procedures are carried out meticulously to maintain the airworthiness of the affected engines. This includes scheduling and performing the ultrasonic inspections and in-situ inspections as detailed in Rolls Royce SB RB.211-72-C818 Revision 6. Failure to comply with these directives could result in severe safety risks, including potential engine failure in-flight, which could endanger lives and property. Consequently, these entities must allocate the necessary resources and personnel to adhere to the requirements set forth in the directive.
Any breach of the provisions outlined in this Airworthiness Directive can lead to serious consequences. The regulations under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 may impose both civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. Civil penalties can include fines, with the exact amount determined by the severity of the breach and the discretion of the court. Additionally, criminal penalties may apply, which could result in imprisonment for individuals responsible for the oversight or maintenance of the aircraft, depending on the gravity of the violation. The maximum penalties are not explicitly stated in the directive but are governed by the broader legal framework within which the Civil Aviation Regulations operate. Ensuring strict compliance with the AD is, therefore, not only a regulatory requirement but also a critical safety measure.