COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Radio Communication and Navigation Equipment
AD/RAD/32 Garrett Emergency Locator Transmitter 5/76
Applicability: Rescu 88 P/No. 627484-1 Series 3 and Series 21, 627484-3 Series 3 and Series 21;
627484-5 Series 3 and Series 21; 627674-1 Series 1; 627674-3 Series 1; 627674-5
Series 1, Rescu 88L() P/No. 627810-1 Series 1; 627810-2 Series 1; 627810-3 Series
1; 627818-2 Series 1; 627818-3 Series 1.
Document: Garret Manufacturing Ltd., SB 25-16 dated August 18, 1975. Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 31 May 1976.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, established by the Commonwealth of Australia, form a comprehensive legal framework for civil aviation within the country. One of the specific pieces of legislation within this broader framework is the Airworthiness Directives, which were introduced to address safety concerns and ensure that aircraft and related equipment meet necessary standards. Among these directives is AD/RAD/32, concerning the Garrett Emergency Locator Transmitter. This directive was enacted to ensure the safety and reliability of emergency locator transmitters in aircraft, specifically targeting models such as the Rescu 88 P/No. and Rescu 88L. The objective is to mandate compliance within a specific timeframe to maintain the integrity and functionality of these critical safety devices. The enforcement of such directives is overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, ensuring adherence to safety standards and reducing potential risks in aviation operations.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 – 107, applies to the management and oversight of civil aviation activities within Australia, encompassing all aircraft, pilots, air traffic control, and aviation maintenance services. This legislation mandates strict adherence to airworthiness directives, including AD/RAD/32 concerning Garrett Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs) used in specific aircraft models, such as the Rescu 88 P/No. 627484-1 Series 3 and Series 21, among others. These regulations ensure that all specified aircraft are maintained to the required safety standards. Compliance with these directives is mandatory for all operators of the affected aircraft and must be met within 100 hours of time in service after 31 May 1976, as outlined in the document by Garrett Manufacturing Ltd., SB 25-16 dated August 18, 1975. The regulations are enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and cover all civil aviation activities across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a uniform standard of safety and compliance throughout the nation.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, Section 107, includes a directive concerning the Garrett Emergency Locator Transmitter, which is outlined in AD/RAD/32. This directive applies to specific Rescue 88 and Rescue 88L transmitter models, including Rescu 88 P/No. 627484-1 Series 3 and 21, among others, and mandates compliance within 100 hours of service time after 31 May 1976. The directive is based on a document from Garrett Manufacturing Ltd., SB 25-16, dated 18 August 1975.
The Act imposes a clear requirement on the operators of aircraft equipped with the specified Garrett Emergency Locator Transmitter models to ensure that these devices meet the specified standards. Operators must verify that the transmitters are correctly installed and functioning as intended. The directive mandates that compliance must be achieved within 100 hours of time in service following the effective date of 31 May 1976. This timeframe ensures that all necessary checks and modifications are completed in a timely manner to maintain the safety and compliance of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the requirements set out in AD/RAD/32 may result in significant consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to take enforcement action against any non-compliant aircraft or operators. The potential penalties for non-compliance can include fines, operational restrictions, or even the grounding of the aircraft until the necessary compliance is achieved. The specific penalties are determined by the severity of the non-compliance and the potential risk to aviation safety.
Additionally, the Act outlines potential civil and criminal consequences for non-compliance. Civil penalties may include fines up to a specified amount, depending on the gravity of the violation. In more severe cases, criminal charges may be brought against individuals responsible for the non-compliance, resulting in potential imprisonment. The exact penalties are detailed within the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 and are enforced by CASA to ensure the highest standards of aviation safety are maintained across all operations.