AD/PROCTOR/2(Re-Issue) - Rear Fuselage Drain Holes - Modification

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, were enacted to ensure the safety and airworthiness of aircraft within Australian airspace. One of the legislative instruments under this Act is F2006B06341, which pertains to the Percival Proctor Series Aeroplanes and mandates modifications to the rear fuselage drain holes. This legislation was introduced by the Commonwealth of Australia to address specific safety concerns related to water accumulation in the rear fuselage of certain Percival Proctor models, which could potentially compromise the aircraft's structural integrity. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority, under the authority of the Australian Government, established this directive to ensure compliance with the necessary safety standards. The policy objective is to mitigate any risk associated with water ingress by requiring immediate modification of the specified aircraft models to prevent potential hazards during flight operations.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically AD/PROCTOR/2 concerning Percival Proctor Series Aeroplanes, applies to all Mk. I, Mk. II and Mk. III aircraft as indicated, which are operated outside Class 1. This legislation is an integral component of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, ensuring that these aircraft meet certain safety standards. The Act mandates modifications to the rear fuselage drain holes to comply with the specified requirements, which include adhering to Percival Mod. Nos. 210 (Mk.I) and 676 (Mk’s II and III), DCA/PROCTOR/2, or A.N.O. 105.1.26.0.2.2. Compliance with these directives is required forthwith, ensuring the aircraft are maintained to the highest safety standards. The scope of this directive extends to all relevant aircraft within the specified categories, leaving no room for deviation from the outlined safety measures. This legislation, enforced by the Commonwealth of Australia, underscores the importance of adhering to these airworthiness directives to maintain operational safety.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, PART 39 - 105, specifically the Airworthiness Directive AD/PROCTOR/2 (Re-Issue), pertain to the modification of rear fuselage drain holes for Percival Proctor Series Aeroplanes. Section 39-105 outlines the applicability of the directive to all Mk. I, Mk. II, and Mk. III versions of the Proctor, except those operated in Class 1 (section 6/50). The directive requires modification of the rear fuselage drain holes to ensure safety and compliance with airworthiness standards. Specifically, the modifications must be applied to Percival Mod. Nos. 210 (Mk. I) and 676 (Mk. II and III), or in accordance with DCA/PROCTOR/2, or as per A.N.O. 105.1.26.0.2.2. The directive mandates that compliance be achieved forthwith, indicating an immediate requirement for action. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties governed by this directive are clear and immediate. Operators of the specified Percival Proctor Series Aeroplanes must ensure that the modifications to the rear fuselage drain holes are completed without delay. This involves either applying the modifications as per Percival Mod. Nos. 210 or 676, following the directives in DCA/PROCTOR/2, or adhering to the specifications in A.N.O. 105.1.26.0.2.2. These obligations are non-negotiable, and the directive explicitly states that compliance must be achieved forthwith. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the aircraft being deemed non-airworthy, which could lead to operational prohibitions. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 impose significant penalties and consequences for non-compliance with the airworthiness directives. Any breach of the requirements outlined in AD/PROCTOR/2 (Re-Issue) could result in severe civil and criminal repercussions. Operators found in breach of these regulations may face fines and other penalties as stipulated in the legislation. Additionally, non-compliance may lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, potentially including the grounding of the affected aircraft until the required modifications are completed. The seriousness of these consequences underscores the importance of adhering to the directive to ensure the continued airworthiness and safety of the Percival Proctor Series Aeroplanes.