AD/PITTS S-2/3 - Horizontal Stabiliser Bracing Attachment - Modification - CANCELLED

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2008L04553 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.

CASA or its predecessors issued AD/PITTS S-2/3 affecting Pitts model S-2A aircraft.  CASA has reviewed this AD and as a result has cancelled it.  The cancellation will become effective on 15 January 2009.  No replacement AD is required.

As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation.  The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

 

The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation and to provide a legal framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia. It grants the Governor-General the authority to make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of air navigation safety. One such regulation is regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are legislative instruments, disallowable under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and subject to the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The ADs serve as a mechanism for the State of Registry to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with the obligations of the State of Design under Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and associated regulations are designed to harmonise Australia’s civil aviation safety standards with international obligations, ensuring both domestic and international aviation safety.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, thereby ensuring the safety of air navigation. These directives are legislative instruments as defined under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. ADs are essential for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, in line with the responsibilities outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, where the State of Design and the State of Registry play pivotal roles. CASA, acting within its regulatory capacity, has the authority to issue, review, and cancel such directives. For instance, AD/PITTS S-2/3, which pertained to Pitts model S-2A aircraft, has been cancelled by CASA, effective 15 January 2009, in compliance with Australia's international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This cancellation was executed without public consultation and does not require a Regulatory Impact Statement, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, specifically under section 98, empowers the Governor-General to establish regulations that ensure the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 authorises the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are essential instruments for maintaining the airworthiness of aircraft and ensuring the safety of air travel. It is also important to note that under subregulation 39.001(5) and section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, ADs are considered disallowable instruments and are classified as legislative instruments under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design holds primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. This entails providing necessary information to the States of Registry to ensure the aircraft's airworthiness. Conversely, the State of Registry is tasked with the responsibility of ensuring the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft by developing or adopting appropriate requirements. These requirements are integral in maintaining the safety and compliance of aircraft within their jurisdiction. In line with these international obligations, CASA has issued, reviewed, and subsequently cancelled AD/PITTS S-2/3, which affected Pitts model S-2A aircraft. The cancellation will take effect from 15 January 2009, and no replacement AD is required. The obligations imposed by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 on CASA include the issuance, review, and cancellation of ADs as necessary to maintain the safety of air navigation. CASA must ensure that all ADs are compliant with Australia’s international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and that they adequately address any identified safety issues. The State of Registry must also ensure that the requirements for continuing airworthiness are met for each aircraft within its jurisdiction. This involves monitoring compliance with ADs and ensuring that any identified issues are promptly addressed. There are specific consequences for non-compliance with ADs. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, failure to comply with an airworthiness directive can result in significant civil and criminal penalties. For individuals, the maximum penalty includes a fine of up to $275,000 and/or imprisonment for up to five years. For corporations, the maximum penalty is a fine of up to $1.375 million. These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to ADs to maintain the safety and integrity of air navigation. The Act ensures that all parties involved in civil aviation are held to high standards of safety and compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.