COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Piper PA-36 (Pawnee Brave) Series Aeroplanes
AD/PA-36/2 Stall Warning Detector - Relocation 11/74
Applicability: Model PA-36-285 with S/Nos. 36/7360001 to 36-7460025. Document: 1. SB No. 418; or
2. FAA AD 74-21-02.
Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 29 November 1974.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Parliament, form a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. This legislation, particularly the part addressing airworthiness directives, was introduced to fill critical gaps in aviation safety standards, ensuring that all aircraft operating within Australian airspace meet stringent safety requirements. One specific legislative instrument, F2006B05936, targets the Piper PA-36 (Pawnee Brave) series aeroplanes, focusing on the relocation of the stall warning detector. This directive, detailed in the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, applies to Model PA-36-285 with serial numbers ranging from 36/7360001 to 36-7460025. The objective is to ensure compliance with safety bulletins or Federal Aviation Administration directives within 100 hours of time in service after the specified date of 29 November 1974, thereby enhancing flight safety and operational reliability.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies to specific models of aircraft within the Commonwealth of Australia. In this instance, the legislation targets Piper PA-36 (Pawnee Brave) series aeroplanes, specifically those with serial numbers (S/Nos.) ranging from 36/7360001 to 36-7460025. The directive mandates compliance with the instructions detailed in Service Bulletin No. 418 or FAA AD 74-21-02 concerning the relocation of the stall warning detector. This requirement must be met within 100 hours of time in service after the directive's issuance on 29 November 1974. The regulation ensures that these aircraft meet specific safety standards and are maintained in an airworthy condition, thereby protecting the safety of all those involved in civil aviation within Australia. The directive is specific to the mentioned aircraft models and does not extend to other models or types of aircraft unless similarly specified in other directives.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, includes a Schedule of Airworthiness Directives that governs the safety requirements for various aircraft models, including the Piper PA-36 (Pawnee Brave) Series Aeroplanes. One such directive, AD/PA-36/2, concerns the relocation of the stall warning detector on Model PA-36-285 with serial numbers ranging from 36/7360001 to 36-7460025. This directive mandates compliance with Service Bulletin No. 418 or the Federal Aviation Administration's AD 74-21-02. The compliance period requires adherence within 100 hours of time in service after 29 November 1974.
The obligations imposed by this directive include ensuring that the stall warning detector on the specified Piper PA-36 aeroplanes is relocated as per the Service Bulletin No. 418 or FAA AD 74-21-02. This involves conducting the necessary modifications and ensuring that the aeroplane is airworthy and compliant with the safety standards outlined in the directive. Compliance must be achieved within the specified timeframe to avoid potential safety risks associated with the non-relocation of the stall warning detector.
Failure to comply with this airworthiness directive may result in significant legal and operational consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, non-compliance with an airworthiness directive can lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). These actions may include the issuance of a compliance order, suspension or revocation of an airworthiness certificate, or other regulatory penalties. Additionally, operators may face financial penalties, which can vary depending on the severity and frequency of the breach. The potential for criminal charges and imprisonment for serious violations also exists, underscoring the importance of adhering to the directive's requirements.