AD/PA-30/2 - Carburettor Alternative Air Doors - Replacement

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, address safety standards and compliance requirements in the civil aviation sector. Within this framework, the 1998 Regulations, particularly in Part 39 - 105, establish the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives. This legislative instrument, identified as F2006B05662, focuses on specific aircraft models and their maintenance and operational standards to ensure safety. One such directive, AD/PA-30/2, pertains to the Piper PA-30 and 39 (Twin Comanche) series aeroplanes, mandating the replacement of the carburettor alternative air doors. This directive, applicable to model PA-30 with serial numbers 30-1 to 30-321, references Piper Service Bulletin No. 220 and requires compliance forthwith, underscoring the policy objective of maintaining stringent safety standards and operational integrity in civil aviation.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) governs the operation of aircraft in Australia through the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, with Part 39 addressing the Airworthiness Directives pertinent to specific aircraft models. One such directive, AD/PA-30/2, pertains to the replacement of the carburetor alternative air doors on Piper PA-30 and 39 (Twin Comanche) series aeroplanes. This directive applies to all aircraft of the model PA-30 with serial numbers ranging from 30-1 to 30-321, necessitating compliance forthwith as per Piper Service Bulletin No. 220. This regulation is jurisdictional under the Commonwealth of Australia and is enforceable across the entire nation, ensuring that all aircraft within the specified parameters meet the safety standards set forth by CASA. The directive does not extend to other aircraft models or serial numbers outside the specified range, ensuring that only the affected aircraft are subject to the requirements of this particular airworthiness directive. The scope of this legislation is thus confined to ensuring the safety and compliance of specific Piper PA-30 Twin Comanche aeroplanes, thereby maintaining the integrity and safety of civil aviation in Australia. This directive’s applicability is limited to the geographic jurisdiction of the Commonwealth and is not subject to state or territory-specific modifications, ensuring a uniform standard across the country.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, includes an airworthiness directive (AD) for Piper PA-30 & 39 (Twin Comanche) Series Aeroplanes, which mandates the replacement of the carburettor alternative air doors. This directive is identified as AD/PA-30/2 (Section 5/64). The applicability of this directive is limited to Model PA-30 aeroplanes with serial numbers (S/Nos.) ranging from 30-1 to 30-321. The directive references Piper Service Bulletin No. 220 as the document detailing the compliance requirements. Compliance with this airworthiness directive is mandatory and must be carried out forthwith. The directive requires the replacement of the carburettor alternative air doors on the specified model aeroplanes to ensure continued airworthiness and safety. Operators and owners of these aeroplanes are obligated to adhere to the directive and complete the required modifications without delay. Failure to comply with this directive could result in the aeroplane being deemed unairworthy, which could prevent it from being operated until the necessary modifications are made. Breaching the requirements of this airworthiness directive may result in severe consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to enforce compliance and may take action against non-compliant operators. Such actions could include the imposition of administrative penalties, the issuance of compliance orders, or even the suspension or revocation of the aeroplane's certificate of airworthiness. In cases of significant non-compliance, there may also be potential criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. The exact penalties can vary but are designed to ensure stringent adherence to safety standards within the aviation industry.