AD/PA-22/33 Amdt 7 - Wing Lift Struts

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B05438 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 


Piper PA-22 (Tri-Pacer and Colt) Series Aeroplanes

 

AD/PA-22/33

Amdt 7


Wing Lift Struts 1/2000

 

Applicability: Model PA-22, PA-22-108, PA-22-135 and PA-22S-135, serial numbers 22-1 through 22-9848, and PA-22-150, PA-22S-150, PA-22-160 and PA-22S-160 aircraft.

 

Requirement: 1. Remove the wing lift struts in accordance with Piper Service Bulletin (SB) 528D, dated 19 October 1990, or Piper SB 910A, dated 10 October 1989, as applicable, and accomplish one of the actions in either Requirement 1.a., 1.b., 1.c., 1.d. or 1.e.:

 

  1. Inspect the wing lift struts for corrosion in accordance with the Instructions section in Part 1 of either SB 528D or SB 910A, as applicable.

 

(i)       If no perceptible dents (as defined in the above referenced bulletins) are found in the wing lift strut and no corrosion is externally visible, before further flight, apply corrosion inhibitor to each strut in accordance with whichever of the above referenced bulletins that is applicable

 

(ii)     If a perceptible dent (as defined in the above referenced bulletins) is found in the wing lift strut or external corrosion is found, before further flight, accomplish one of the installations (and subsequent actions presented in each paragraph) specified in Requirements 1.c., 1.d., or 1.e.; or,

 

b.    Inspect the wing lift struts for corrosion in accordance with an X-ray procedure approved by the Authority; or, in accordance with the Procedures and Requirements for Ultrasonic Inspection of Piper Wing Lift Struts attached as Appendix to FAA AD 99-01-05 Amdt 39-10972 (Appendix).

 

(i)       If no corrosion is found that is externally visible and all requirements in the Appendix or X-ray procedure are met, before further flight, apply corrosion inhibitor to each strut in accordance with whichever of the above referenced bulletins that is applicable

 

(ii)     If external corrosion is found or if any of the requirements in the Appendix or X-ray procedure are not met, before further flight, accomplish one of the installations (and subsequent actions presented in each paragraph) specified in Requirements 1.c., 1.d., or 1.e.

 

c.    Install original equipment manufacturer (OEM) part number wing struts (or FAA -approved equivalent part numbers) that have been inspected in accordance with the specifications presented in either Requirement 1.a. or 1.b. and are found to be serviceable according to the inspection requirements included in these Requirements.; or,

 

d.    Install new sealed wing lift strut assemblies, part numbers as specified in SB 528D and SB 910A (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) on each wing as specified in the Instructions section in Part II of the above referenced bulletins. These sealed wing lift strut assemblies also include the wing lift strut forks; or,

Note 1: Installation of new sealed wing lift strut assemblies constitute terminating action for the inspection requirements of both Requirement 1 and 2 of this Directive.

 

e.    Install F. Atlee Dodge wing lift strut assemblies in accordance with F. Atlee Dodge Installation Instructions No. 3233-1 for Modified Piper Wing Lift Struts (Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA4635NM), dated 1 February 1991.

 

2.    For all affected aircraft models, remove the wing lift strut forks, and accomplish one of the following (the actions in either Requirement 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., 2.d., or 2.e. of this Directive):

 

  1. Inspect the wing lift strut forks using magnetic particle procedures.

 

(i)       If no cracks are found, reinspect, provided that the replacement requirements of Requirement 2.a.(ii) have been met.

 

(ii)    Replace the wing lift strut forks at whichever of the following is applicable:

 

-  If cracks are found on any wing lift strut fork: before further flight;

 

-  If the aircraft is equipped with floats or has been equipped with floats within the last 2,000 hours time in service and no cracks are found during the above inspections: Upon accumulating 1,000 hours time in service on the wing lift strut forks or within the next 100 hours time in service , whichever occurs later; or,

 

-  If the aircraft has not been equipped with floats within the last 2,000 hours time in service and no cracks are found during the above inspections: Upon accumulating 2,000 hours time in service on the wing lift strut forks or within the next 100 hours time in service, whichever occurs later.

 

(iii)  Replacement parts shall be of the same part numbers of the existing part (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) and shall be manufactured with rolled threads. Lift strut forks manufactured with machined (cut) threads shall not be utilised.

 

(iv)   The 500-hour time in service interval repetitive inspections are still required when the above replacements are accomplished.

 

b.    Install new OEM part number wing lift strut forks (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers). Reinspect and replace these wing lift strut forks at the intervals specified in Requirements 2.a.(i), 2.a.(ii), 2.a.(iii), and 2.a.(iv)

 

c.    Install new sealed wing lift strut assemblies, part numbers as specified in SB 528D and SB 910A (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) on each wing, as specified in the Instructions section in Part II of the above referenced bulletins.

 

(i)       This installation may have “already been accomplished” through the actions specified in Requirement 1.d. of this Directive.

(ii)     No repetitive inspections are required after installing these sealed wing lift strut assemblies.

 

d.    Install Jensen Aircraft wing lift strut fork assemblies as specified in the STC’s presented in the paragraphs that follow, as applicable, in accordance with Jensen Aircraft Installation Instructions for Modified Lift Strut Fittings, which incorporates the following pages:

 

Pages

Revision Level

Date

1 and 5

Original Issue

July 15, 1983

2, 4, and 6

Revision No.1

March 30, 1984

a and 3

Revision No.2

April 20,1984

 

No repetitive inspections are required after installing Jensen Aircraft wing lift strut fork assemblies; however, repetitive inspections of the lift strut are required as specified in Requirements 1.a., 1b., or 1.c. of this Directive:

 

For the Model PA-22 aircraft with STC SA1587NM.

 

e.    Install F. Atlee Dodge wing lift strut assemblies in accordance with F. Atlee Dodge Installation Instructions No. 3233-1 for Modified Piper Wing Lift Struts (STC SA4635NM) dated February 1,1991.

 

(i)       No repetitive inspections of the wing lift strut forks are required when these assemblies are installed

 

(ii)     These installations may have already been accomplished through the actions specified in Requirement 1.e. of this Directive.

 

3.    If holes are drilled, in either one of the scenarios presented in paragraphs 3.a. and

3.b. to attach cuffs, door clips, or other hardware, inspect the wing lift struts using the procedures specified in Requirements 1.a. and 1.b of this Directive:

 

  1. Wing lift strut assemblies installed in accordance with Requirement 1.d. or 2.c. of this Directive; or,

 

b.    F. Atlee Dodge wing lift strut assemblies installed in accordance with Requirement 1.e. or 2.e. of this Directive.

 

4.    Accomplish one of the following:

 

  1. Install “NO STEP” decal, Piper part number 80944-02, on each wing lift strut approximately 150 mm (6-inches) from the bottom of the struts in a way that the letters can be read when entering and exiting the aircraft; or,

 

b.    Paint the statement “NO STEP” approximately 150 mm (6-inches) from the bottom of the struts in a way that the letters can be read when entering and exiting the aircraft. Use a minimum of 25 mm (1-inch) letters using a colour that contrasts with the colour of the strut.

Note 2: FAA AD 99-01-05 Amdt 39-10972 refers.

 

Compliance: 1. Within 1 calendar month after 31 December 1999 or within 24 months of the last inspection in accordance with Requirement 1 of the previous issue of this Directive, whichever occurs later.

 

1.a.(i) Reinspect at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months, and accomplish any of the Requirement 1 actions of this Directive.

 

1.b.(i) Reinspect at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months, and accomplish any of the Requirement 1 actions of this Directive.

 

1.c. Reinspect at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months in accordance with the specifications presented in Requirements 1.a. or 1.b. of this Directive.

 

1.e. Reinspect at intervals not to exceed 60 calendar months in accordance with the specifications presented in Requirements 1.a. or 1.b. of this Directive.

 

2.    Within 100 hours time in service after 31 December 1999, or within 500 hours after the last inspection, whichever occurs later.

 

2.a.(i) Reinspect at intervals not to exceed 500 hours time in service.

 

3.    At intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months.

 

4.    Within 1 calendar month after 31 December 1999, unless already accomplished, and thereafter before further flight after the installation of any lift strut assembly.

 

This Amendment becomes effective on 31 December 1999.

 

Background:   The manufacturer considers inspection of the lower bottom area of the struts critical.

The detection of internal corrosion in struts is in most cases difficult, and may not become apparent until advanced completely through the tube wall. Amendment 2 addressed the fitment of new unsealed struts. Amendment 3 updated the reference document, and allowed new sealed struts as terminating action. The new strut also incorporates a redesigned strut fork.

 

Amendment 4 introduced a reduced corrosion inspection interval following two reports of excessive corrosion appearing within the 5 year interval. The requirement that the wing struts must be removed was also clarified, since service history revealed that water may enter the struts and resulting corrosion may go undetected if the struts are not removed. This has led directly to at least one fatal accident.

 

Amendment 5 corrected the compliance paragraph to allow 24 months since last X- ray inspection.

 

Amendment 6 introduced inspection of the strut upper end if the upper cuff fairing is attached by a screw. Reports were received of severe internal corrosion of wing struts at the upper cuff fairing screw attachment hole area.

 

Amendment 7 is issued to align this Directive with the requirements of a new Country of Origin FAA AD which supersedes AD 93-10-06; which was referenced in the previous issue of this Directive.

Amendment 6 of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 18 July 1996. Amendment 5 of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 20 July 1995.

The original Issue of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 5 October 1989.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) introduced the Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Piper PA-22 (Tri-Pacer and Colt) Series Aeroplanes in 1989 to address issues related to wing lift strut corrosion, which had resulted in at least one fatal accident. The AD mandates rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures to ensure the structural integrity of the wing lift struts and forks of specified Piper aircraft models. Compliance with the AD requires operators to undertake regular inspections and corrective actions, including the removal and replacement of struts and forks, application of corrosion inhibitors, and installation of new components where necessary. The AD aims to prevent corrosion-related failures that could compromise flight safety. This continuous oversight was reinforced through multiple amendments, the latest of which was issued to align with updated Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards in 2000.

Scope and Application

The legislative instrument F2006B05438, specifically addressing Piper PA-22 (Tri-Pacer and Colt) Series Aeroplanes, applies to the model PA-22, PA-22-108, PA-22-135, and PA-22S-135 aircraft with serial numbers 22-1 through 22-9848, as well as PA-22-150, PA-22S-150, PA-22-160, and PA-22S-160 aircraft. This regulation is intended to ensure the structural integrity and safety of these aircraft by mandating specific inspections and actions concerning the wing lift struts. The requirement to remove the wing lift struts and inspect them for corrosion, or replace them with approved components, aims to prevent potential failures due to undetected corrosion. The geographic reach of this legislation is broad, applying to all aircraft within the specified models and serial numbers, regardless of where they are registered or operated, provided they are registered under Australian jurisdiction. This Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as the specific Service Bulletins and installation instructions referenced within the directive, ensuring that the implementation of the requirements is uniformly adhered to across the affected fleet.

Key Provisions

The legislation pertains to Piper PA-22 (Tri-Pacer and Colt) Series Aeroplanes and specifically addresses the wing lift struts and lift strut forks. The main operative sections (Requirements) of the AD/PA-22/33 Amendment 7 require the removal of wing lift struts and the inspection or replacement of these components to ensure airworthiness. Specifically, the wing lift struts must be inspected for corrosion and either treated with corrosion inhibitor or replaced if necessary (Requirement 1). Similarly, the wing lift strut forks must be inspected for cracks and replaced if any are found (Requirement 2). Additionally, if holes are drilled in the struts to attach hardware, they must be inspected using the same procedures as outlined in Requirement 1 (Requirement 3). Finally, a "NO STEP" decal or marking must be applied to the struts to prevent boarding (Requirement 4). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties or entities it governs. The aircraft owner or operator must ensure that the wing lift struts and lift strut forks are inspected, repaired, or replaced as required by the legislation (Requirements 1-4). These inspections and actions must be performed in accordance with the specified procedures and intervals (Compliance sections). For instance, the wing lift struts must be inspected within a certain timeframe after December 31, 1999, or within a specified interval after the last inspection (Compliance 1). Similarly, the wing lift strut forks must be inspected and replaced if necessary within a specified interval (Compliance 2). Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act may result in civil or criminal consequences, including penalties. The specific penalties are not stated in the text; however, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can result in significant fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the violation and the jurisdiction. Additionally, failure to comply with the Act may result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which could lead to grounding and potential loss of revenue for the operator. It is essential for aircraft owners and operators to adhere to the requirements of the Act to ensure the safety of passengers and crew and to avoid any potential legal or financial repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.