Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically in Part 39 - 105, detail the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) schedule of airworthiness directives, including AD/P68/40. This directive was introduced to address specific maintenance and safety concerns related to the Partenavia P68 Series Aeroplanes. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, the legislation aims to ensure the continued safety and airworthiness of aircraft within Australia's airspace. The directive requires action in accordance with Partenavia Mandatory Service Bulletin 91 and references RAI AD 94-026, mandating compliance at the next 100-hour inspection after 28 April 1994 and at intervals not exceeding one calendar year. This requirement follows the reporting of a case of corroded shelves on the stabilator torque tube attachment, flap, and aileron hinge shelves to ensure ongoing structural integrity and safety. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, through the specified airworthiness directive AD/P68/40, seek to mitigate risks associated with structural corrosion in certain aircraft components. By enforcing regular inspections and maintenance actions as outlined in the service bulletin, CASA aims to maintain high safety standards and prevent potential failures that could compromise flight safety. The directive's policy objective is to ensure that all Model P68 aircraft remain compliant with safety standards, thereby safeguarding passengers and crew on board.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s Schedule of Airworthiness Directives under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, applies to all Model P68 aircraft. This legislative instrument mandates compliance with Partenavia Mandatory Service Bulletin 91 concerning the stabilator torque tube attachment shelves, flap and aileron hinge shelves. The directive requires action to be taken at the next 100-hour inspection following 28 April 1994, with subsequent actions mandated at intervals not exceeding one calendar year. This regulation directly impacts aircraft operators and maintenance personnel ensuring adherence to safety standards identified by the manufacturer in response to reports of corroded shelves, as referenced in RAI AD 94-026. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of these regulations is nationwide, governing all operations within the Australian Commonwealth. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions but requires strict compliance by the specified entities to maintain airworthiness.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105, include a directive concerning the airworthiness of Partenavia P68 Series aeroplanes (sections 39.105). This directive, known as AD/P68/40, mandates particular actions regarding the stabilator torque tube attachment shelves, flap and aileron hinge shelves. These actions must align with Partenavia Mandatory Service Bulletin 91 and reference RAI AD 94-026. The directive applies to all Model P68 aircraft (section 39.105(1)). It requires compliance with the specified maintenance actions at the next 100-hour inspection following 28 April 1994 and subsequently at intervals not exceeding one calendar year (section 39.105(2)). This stems from a reported case of corroded shelves, highlighting the necessity for regular inspection and maintenance to ensure the continued airworthiness of these aircraft. Entities and parties governed by these regulations, including aircraft operators and maintenance service providers, must adhere to the outlined requirements (section 39.105). They are obligated to inspect the stabilator torque tube attachment shelves, flap and aileron hinge shelves in accordance with the specified schedule and the instructions provided in the Partenavia Mandatory Service Bulletin 91. Failure to comply with these directives could compromise the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft. Failure to adhere to the airworthiness directives stipulated in AD/P68/40 may result in serious safety implications (section 39.105(3)). The regulations impose penalties for non-compliance, which can include fines and other legal repercussions. While the exact penalties are not specified in the excerpt, the overarching intent is to enforce strict compliance to maintain high safety standards in civil aviation. The potential consequences underscore the importance of regular inspections and adherence to manufacturer recommendations to avoid any adverse outcomes.