COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Mitsubishi MU-2 Series Aeroplanes
AD/MU-2/5
Amdt 3
Wing Structural Fatigue Limitation 4/79
Applicability: MU-2B-30 and MU-2B-36A aircraft.
Requirement: 1. Retire from service the outer wing front spar joint fitting.
2. Retire the aircraft from service.
Compliance:
Note 1: The lives for the MU-2B-36A are conservative interim values and will be reviewed on receipt of further data from the manufacturer.
Note 2: Similar restrictions may be applied to other Models of the type should they enter the Australian Register.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, amended by the Legislative instrument F2006B11380, address the specific issue of wing structural fatigue in Mitsubishi MU-2 Series aeroplanes. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, this regulation aims to ensure the safety and airworthiness of these aircraft models within Australian airspace. The primary objective is to mitigate risks associated with structural fatigue by imposing stringent requirements for the MU-2B-30 and MU-2B-36A aircraft, including the mandatory retirement of certain wing components and, in some cases, the entire aircraft. This directive underscores the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's commitment to maintaining the highest safety standards and preventing potential catastrophic failures.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, under Part 39 - 105 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically addresses the Mitsubishi MU-2 Series Aeroplanes, including models MU-2B-30 and MU-2B-36A. This legislative instrument mandates that operators of these aircraft must retire the outer wing front spar joint fitting from service and, subsequently, retire the entire aircraft if the specified requirement is not met. This directive ensures that the aircraft maintain a safe standard of airworthiness and reflects the conservative interim values for MU-2B-36A lives pending further manufacturer data. The regulation applies nationally within Australia and is subject to CASA's jurisdiction, which includes the potential extension of similar restrictions to other MU-2 models if they are registered in Australia. Subordinate instruments may further define or refine the application of these directives.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39-105, outlines Airworthiness Directives (ADs) for various aircraft types, including the Mitsubishi MU-2 series aeroplanes. AD/MU-2/5 Amendment 3, issued in 1979, pertains to wing structural fatigue limitations. This directive applies to MU-2B-30 and MU-2B-36A aircraft (section 1). The primary requirement outlined in this AD is the retirement from service of the outer wing front spar joint fitting. Additionally, it mandates that the aircraft itself be retired from service until the specified modifications are completed (section 2).
Under this AD, the entities governed by the regulation are required to adhere to the outlined procedures for the inspection, repair, or replacement of the specified wing components. Owners and operators of MU-2B-30 and MU-2B-36A aircraft must ensure that the outer wing front spar joint fitting is either repaired or replaced as necessary and that the aircraft is grounded until the work is satisfactorily completed. The regulations further specify that the lives of the MU-2B-36A are considered conservative interim values and are subject to future review based on additional data from the manufacturer (section 1, Note 1). If similar models are registered in Australia, they may also be subject to these restrictions (section 1, Note 2).
Failure to comply with the AD/MU-2/5 Amendment 3 could result in significant legal consequences. Operators who do not adhere to the requirements of retiring the specified wing components and the aircraft from service may face enforcement actions. While the Civil Aviation Regulations do not explicitly detail specific penalties for non-compliance with ADs, general provisions under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 could apply. These may include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach and the discretion of the court. The precise penalties would be determined based on the specific circumstances of each case and the applicable laws.