COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Mitsubishi MU-2 Series Aeroplanes
AD/MU-2/2 Windows - Cabin and Cockpit - Modification 4/70
Applicability: As detailed in the requirement document. Document: Mitsubishi MU-2 SB No. 102.
Compliance: Before achieving 1800 hours total time in service.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Regulations 1998, enacted in 1998, were established to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. This legislative instrument is a critical component of the overarching Civil Aviation Act 1988, and it was introduced to address the need for stringent regulations to govern the civil aviation sector comprehensively. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 are administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, with the primary policy objective of maintaining and enhancing the safety standards of aircraft operations within Australia. Within this regulatory framework, Airworthiness Directives (AD) such as AD/MU-2/2 are issued to ensure compliance with specific safety requirements for particular aircraft models, such as the Mitsubishi MU-2 Series Aeroplanes. This particular AD mandates modifications to the windows of both the cabin and cockpit to ensure airworthiness before the aircraft reaches 1800 hours of total time in service, as outlined in the Mitsubishi MU-2 Service Bulletin No. 102.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, applies to all Mitsubishi MU-2 Series aeroplanes operating within the Commonwealth of Australia. These regulations mandate modifications to the windows of both the cabin and cockpit of the aircraft to ensure compliance with safety standards. The modifications must be completed before the aeroplane accumulates 1800 hours of total time in service, as stipulated in the requirement document referenced as Mitsubishi MU-2 SB No. 102. The regulation is applicable to any individual or entity operating such aircraft within the Commonwealth and extends to ensuring the airworthiness of these aeroplanes in accordance with the prescribed safety directives. No specific exclusions or exemptions are mentioned within the provided text, and the regulation’s application is enforced through the oversight of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. The authority may further detail or extend the application of these regulations through subordinate instruments, thereby ensuring comprehensive adherence to safety standards across the aviation industry.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, includes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Mitsubishi MU-2 Series Aeroplanes, designated AD/MU-2/2 (4/70). This directive pertains to modifications of the cabin and cockpit windows. The applicability of this directive is detailed in the requirement document, Mitsubishi MU-2 Service Bulletin No. 102. Compliance with this directive is mandatory before the aircraft reaches 1800 hours of total time in service.
Under these regulations, the primary obligation for operators of Mitsubishi MU-2 Series Aeroplanes is to ensure that the modifications to the cabin and cockpit windows are carried out before the aircraft accumulates 1800 hours of total time in service. This requirement is critical to maintaining the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft, as the modifications address specific vulnerabilities or safety concerns identified in the Mitsubishi MU-2 Service Bulletin No. 102.
Failure to comply with the AD/MU-2/2 (4/70) could lead to serious safety implications, as the modifications are essential for maintaining the structural integrity and operational safety of the aircraft. While the specific civil or criminal consequences for non-compliance are not detailed in the extract provided, under the broader framework of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can result in severe penalties. These may include fines, operational restrictions, or even the grounding of the aircraft. The exact penalties can vary based on the severity and impact of the non-compliance but can be substantial under aviation safety laws.