COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Maule M-5 Series Aeroplanes
AD/ML-M5/1 Fuel Lines - Inspection 10/78
Applicability: Model M-5-210C with S/Nos. 6190C to 6204C. Model M-5-235C with S/Nos. 7061C to 7160C, 7163C to 7167C, 7169C to 7192C, 7194C and 7197C.
Document: Maule SL No. 39.
Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 31 October 1978.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 were enacted to provide comprehensive regulations for civil aviation safety within Australia, ensuring that all civil aviation activities adhere to safety standards set forth by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Part 39 of these regulations focuses on the safety of specific aircraft types, with a particular emphasis on issuing Airworthiness Directives to address identified safety issues. The policy objective of these regulations is to mitigate risks to public safety by enforcing stringent safety measures and ensuring that all aircraft meet the required standards before being allowed to operate. One example of such measures is the Airworthiness Directive concerning Maule M-5 Series Aeroplanes, specifically addressing fuel line inspections to prevent potential hazards associated with ageing or faulty fuel lines. This directive was introduced to address safety concerns related to the integrity of fuel lines in certain models of Maule M-5 aeroplanes, thereby enhancing overall flight safety and protecting both the crew and passengers.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has established specific airworthiness directives under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 to ensure the safety and reliability of aircraft within Australia. One such directive, AD/ML-M5/1, pertains to the inspection of fuel lines in certain Maule M-5 Series aeroplanes. This directive applies to specific models and serial numbers of the Maule M-5-210C and M-5-235C aircraft, namely, those with serial numbers within certain ranges. The directive mandates that these aircraft must undergo an inspection of their fuel lines within 100 hours of time in service after 31 October 1978. This regulatory action is intended to address any potential safety issues related to the fuel lines, ensuring they meet the necessary safety standards to prevent failure during flight. The directive applies directly to aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance personnel responsible for the compliance and airworthiness of these specific aircraft models, thus ensuring that these aircraft continue to operate safely within Australian airspace.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, outlines the requirements for maintaining the airworthiness of certain aircraft, including the Maule M-5 Series Aeroplanes. Under this legislation, section AD/ML-M5/1 focuses on the inspection of fuel lines for specific models of Maule M-5 aeroplanes. This directive applies to Model M-5-210C with serial numbers (S/Nos.) 6190C to 6204C and Model M-5-235C with S/Nos. 7061C to 7160C, 7163C to 7167C, 7169C to 7192C, 7194C, and 7197C (section 10/78). Compliance with this directive must be achieved within 100 hours of time in service after 31 October 1978, and it necessitates adherence to Maule Service Letter No. 39.
The obligations imposed by this legislation are clear and straightforward. Aircraft operators must ensure that the specified models of Maule M-5 aeroplanes are inspected for fuel line integrity as mandated. This inspection must be conducted according to the detailed guidelines provided in Maule Service Letter No. 39. It is essential that the aircraft are brought into compliance within the stipulated timeframe of 100 hours of time in service after 31 October 1978. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in serious safety implications and potential legal consequences.
In terms of enforcement and consequences, any breach of the provisions outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can lead to significant legal repercussions. For instance, if an operator fails to adhere to the airworthiness directive concerning fuel line inspection, they may face penalties as prescribed under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The maximum penalties for non-compliance can include substantial fines and, in severe cases, criminal charges against individuals responsible for the oversight. Such penalties serve as a deterrent to ensure that all operators prioritise safety and comply with regulatory requirements to maintain the highest standards of airworthiness.