CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The United States FAA has issued AD 2006-10-21 affecting Lycoming piston engines. The United States is the State of Design for these engines. CASA has assessed this AD and has issued Australian AD/LYC/116, which will become effective on 31 May 2006.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, New Technologies and Systems, in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to regulate civil aviation within Australia, with a focus on ensuring the safety of air navigation. The Act provides the authority for the Governor-General to create regulations under section 98, and these regulations are instrumental in maintaining the safety standards of air navigation. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further specify the mechanisms by which the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for various kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products, as outlined in regulation 39.001. These ADs are legislative instruments, as per subregulation 39.001(5) and the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
Under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, specifically Annex 8, the State of Design is tasked with the responsibility of ensuring the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide necessary information to the States of Registry. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must then assess this information and, if deemed appropriate, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements of the State of Design. This legislative framework ensures that Australia adheres to international standards and effectively manages the continuing airworthiness of aircraft registered within its territory.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 applies to entities involved in the design, manufacture, and registry of aircraft within Australia. Specifically, the regulations pertain to the State of Design, which has the responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, and the State of Registry, which is responsible for the ongoing airworthiness of individual aircraft registered within its territory. The regulations mandate that when a State of Design issues an airworthiness directive (AD) for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) must assess this directive and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements of the State of Design. This AD mechanism ensures that aircraft meet international safety standards as per the Convention on International Civil Aviation. In this particular instance, CASA has issued Australian AD/LYC/116 in response to an AD issued by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) concerning Lycoming piston engines, which will become effective on 31 May 2006. The issuance of this AD is a legislative instrument under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and it does not require public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement as determined by the Office of Regulatory Review.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, as they pertain to airworthiness directives, are found primarily in section 98, which grants the Governor-General the authority to make regulations aimed at ensuring the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. It is also important to note that according to subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, an airworthiness directive is a disallowable instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and as such, it is considered a legislative instrument under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the associated regulations are multifaceted. Firstly, the State of Design, which in this case is the United States for Lycoming piston engines, has the overarching responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This responsibility includes providing necessary information to the States of Registry to ensure the aircraft's continued airworthiness. In Australia, CASA, acting as the national airworthiness authority, must assess any international airworthiness directives issued by the State of Design. If deemed appropriate, CASA must then issue its own airworthiness directive to enforce the requirements set by the State of Design. Additionally, the State of Registry, which is Australia in this context, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft on the Australian Register.
Breaches of the requirements outlined in the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 can result in both civil and criminal consequences. The specific penalties for non-compliance with airworthiness directives are not detailed within the text provided, but generally, failure to adhere to these regulations can lead to significant fines, imprisonment, or both. The severity of the penalties can vary depending on the nature and extent of the breach. Furthermore, non-compliance can also result in the grounding of affected aircraft, which can have severe operational and financial repercussions for airlines and operators.
It is also worth noting that the process for issuing airworthiness directives does not involve public consultation due to Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and the nature of the directives themselves. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that airworthiness directives do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement, as they are based on international safety standards and the necessity to maintain the airworthiness of aircraft. The issuance of such directives is overseen by the Manager, New Technologies and Systems, within CASA's Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, in accordance with the provisions outlined in subsection 84A(2) of the Act.