COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Lycoming Piston Engines
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
David Alan Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 16 May 2001
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 23 May 2001.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, amended by F2006B11198, were enacted to address safety concerns associated with Lycoming piston engines used in civil aviation. This legislative instrument was introduced to establish specific airworthiness directives for these engines, ensuring that they meet required safety standards. The regulations are administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is responsible for the oversight and enforcement of aviation safety in Australia. The policy objective of this directive is to mitigate any unsafe conditions related to Lycoming piston engines through mandatory actions and compliance requirements, ultimately enhancing the overall safety of civil aviation.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) outlined in PART 39 - 106 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies specifically to Lycoming Piston Engines, a critical component of certain aircraft. This legislation is issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), an agency of the Commonwealth of Australia, and thus holds national jurisdiction. The AD mandates that specific actions be taken to address identified unsafe conditions, applying to all aircraft equipped with Lycoming Piston Engines operating within Australia. The directive stipulates the precise circumstances under which the corrective action must be implemented, the instructions to be followed, and the timeframe within which compliance must be achieved. Notably, the AD extends its application through subordinate instruments, ensuring that any subsequent modifications or clarifications to the directive are incorporated into the regulatory framework. While the AD sets out clear requirements, there are no explicit exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds mentioned in the provided text, indicating that the directive applies broadly to all affected aircraft within the national jurisdiction.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) mandates specific actions to address unsafe conditions in Lycoming piston engines. The AD specifies the aircraft or aeronautical products affected (section a), the circumstances under which the action must be taken (section b), and the instructions detailing how the action should be performed (section c). Additionally, it outlines the compliance timeframe (section d).
This legislation imposes obligations on the parties or entities it governs, primarily requiring them to adhere to the AD’s provisions to ensure the safety of the aircraft or aeronautical products. The directive sets out a clear course of action that must be followed meticulously to rectify any identified unsafe conditions. Compliance with these directives is crucial to maintain airworthiness standards and ensure the safe operation of the affected aircraft.
Failure to comply with the AD can lead to significant consequences. The regulations specify offences and penalties for non-compliance, with the potential for both civil and criminal liabilities. Civil penalties may include fines, while criminal penalties could involve imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. The maximum penalties for non-compliance are also defined within the regulations, underscoring the importance of adherence to the AD’s requirements.
The AD’s applicability section identifies the specific Lycoming piston engines that must comply with the directive. This includes detailing the circumstances under which the corrective actions are necessary and providing precise instructions for implementation. These instructions are designed to standardise the approach to addressing the identified safety issues, ensuring consistency across different cases.
The compliance section of the AD sets out the timeframe within which the required actions must be completed. This timeline is crucial for maintaining safety standards and preventing potential risks associated with non-compliance. The AD’s clear directives and specified compliance period ensure that all relevant parties are aware of their obligations and the importance of timely action to rectify any safety concerns.