COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Meta Sokol L.40 Series Aeroplanes
AD/L.40/6
Amdt 1
Elevator Control System - Modification 11/67
Applicability: All models.
Requirement: Install the lower elevator cable assembly with the turnbuckle at the forward end. Compliance: Before 1 September 1971.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 were enacted to provide a comprehensive legal framework governing all aspects of civil aviation within Australia, ensuring safety and efficiency in the sector. This legislation, overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), aims to establish and maintain high standards in the operation of aircraft, certification of personnel, and safety regulations. A notable directive within these regulations is AD/L.40/6 Amendment 1, which pertains to the modification of the elevator control system for Meta Sokol L.40 Series aeroplanes. This directive was introduced to address potential safety issues related to the elevator control system by mandating the installation of the lower elevator cable assembly with the turnbuckle at the forward end. This amendment is applicable to all models of the Meta Sokol L.40 Series and must be completed before 1 September 1971 to ensure compliance with the safety directives established by CASA. The overarching policy objective is to enhance aircraft safety and mitigate risks associated with the specified elevator control system.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105, pertains to the safety directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) concerning the airworthiness of aircraft. This includes the modification of elevator control systems in Meta Sokol L.40 Series Aeroplanes, as outlined in AD/L.40/6 Amendment 1. This legislation applies to all models of the Meta Sokol L.40 Series Aeroplanes, mandating the installation of a lower elevator cable assembly with the turnbuckle at the forward end. The directive requires compliance before 1 September 1971 to ensure the safety and airworthiness of these aircraft. The scope of this regulation is national, extending to all operators of Meta Sokol L.40 Series Aeroplanes within Australia, ensuring uniformity in safety standards across the Commonwealth. Subordinate instruments may further extend or clarify the application of these directives to ensure comprehensive compliance with aviation safety standards.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly in relation to the Meta Sokol L.40 Series Aeroplanes, are found in Part 39, Section 105. This section pertains to the schedule of airworthiness directives, which are legally binding instructions issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure aircraft meet safety standards. Specifically, AD/L.40/6 Amendment 1 focuses on the elevator control system, mandating modifications to the lower elevator cable assembly. According to this directive, the turnbuckle must be installed at the forward end of the assembly (Section 11/67). This requirement applies to all models of the Meta Sokol L.40 Series Aeroplanes.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved, particularly aircraft owners and operators. They must ensure that the modifications specified in AD/L.40/6 Amendment 1 are implemented before the compliance date, which is before 1 September 1971. This involves installing the lower elevator cable assembly with the turnbuckle at the specified end to maintain the aircraft's airworthiness. Failure to comply with these directives could result in the aircraft being deemed non-airworthy, thereby prohibiting its operation until the required modifications are made.
Breaching the provisions outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can have significant consequences. The Act includes provisions for offences, penalties, and civil or criminal consequences for non-compliance. While the specific penalties for breaching AD/L.40/6 Amendment 1 are not detailed in the excerpt, general regulations for non-compliance with airworthiness directives may include fines, imprisonment, or both. The severity of the penalties can depend on the nature and extent of the non-compliance, as well as any resultant harm or risk created by the breach. Operators and owners who fail to adhere to these safety directives risk facing substantial legal repercussions, as well as potential safety hazards that could affect flight operations and passenger safety.