COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series
AD/JT9D/6 Engine Tailpipe/Exhaust Case - Inspection
for Oil Leakage
6/76
Applicability: All JT9D engines containing turbine exhaust cases P/Nos. 701877, 728301 through 728309, 731370 through 731373, 731377, 731565, 738438, 739431, 746128, 746272
through 746274, 749510, 752872 through 752876, 754763, 756838 and 761943.
Document: 1. FAA AD 76-12-03 Pratt & Whitney : Amendment 39-2634; or 2. AD/PW-T/35.
Compliance: In accordance with the Requirement Document.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, form the backbone of aviation safety regulation in Australia, with Part 39 detailing specific requirements for airworthiness directives. One such directive, AD/JT9D/6, pertains to Pratt and Whitney JT9D Series turbine engines, specifically addressing inspection for oil leakage in engine tailpipes/exhaust cases. This legislation was enacted to address the critical safety issue of oil leakage in certain JT9D engine models, which could potentially lead to engine failure or other hazardous situations. The objective is to ensure the airworthiness of these engines by mandating regular inspections to prevent such issues. This directive is issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, aiming to maintain the highest safety standards in Australia's civil aviation sector.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, focusing on Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines of the JT9D series. The particular directive AD/JT9D/6 mandates the inspection of engine tailpipes or exhaust cases for oil leakage, as outlined in AD 76-12-03 Amendment 39-2634 or AD/PW-T/35. This directive applies to all JT9D engines that include turbine exhaust cases with specific part numbers, ensuring that these engines meet safety standards. Compliance with this directive is mandatory and must be conducted in accordance with the detailed requirements specified in the provided documents.
The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is nationwide, as it falls under the Commonwealth of Australia’s regulatory authority. The scope of this directive is limited to the specified Pratt and Whitney JT9D engines, ensuring that only those within the defined parameters are subject to inspection for oil leakage. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the directive, and it is enforced through subordinate instruments as outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, details the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives (AD) for Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines, focusing on the JT9D Series. A key provision of this document is AD/JT9D/6 (6/76), which mandates inspections for oil leakage in the engine tailpipe/exhaust case (section 1). This directive applies to all JT9D engines that contain specific turbine exhaust cases (section 2). The applicability is outlined comprehensively, covering a range of part numbers to ensure all affected engines are identified and inspected.
The obligations imposed by this directive are clear and directive-specific. Owners or operators of aircraft equipped with JT9D engines must comply with the inspection requirements set out in the directive (section 3). The compliance must be in accordance with either FAA AD 76-12-03 Pratt & Whitney: Amendment 39-2634 or AD/PW-T/35 (section 4). This ensures that all inspections are conducted following the latest regulatory standards and recommendations provided by the relevant authorities.
Failure to comply with AD/JT9D/6 can lead to serious consequences. If an aircraft is found to be non-compliant, it may be grounded, and the operator could face penalties (section 5). The exact nature of these penalties is not specified in the text, but it is known that non-compliance with ADs can result in enforcement actions by CASA. In severe cases, this could include fines, legal action, or even criminal charges if the non-compliance is deemed to have caused a safety hazard or incident. The potential maximum penalties for such breaches would depend on the severity and impact of the non-compliance but could be significant given the critical nature of engine inspections for airworthiness.