AD/JT9D/33 - Diffuser Case Inspection

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B11027 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 



Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE


For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.

 

AD/JT9D/33 Diffuser Case Inspection 8/2000

Applicability: Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, -7, -7H, -7A, -7AH, -7F, -7J, -20 and -20J turbofan engines.

 

Requirement: Inspect and replace as necessary diffuser cases that do not comply with the technical requirements of FAA AD 93-19-02 R1 amendment 39-9038.

 

Note: P&W Alert SB No 6076 R1, P&W SB No 5591 R7 and 5591 R4 refers.

 

Compliance: As detailed in the Requirement Document with a revised effective date of this Directive.

 

This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 10 August 2000.

 

Background: This Directive raised to inspect diffuser cases for cracking, and also reduces the crack length allowed before removal of the diffuser case is required. Such cracks could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the aircraft.


 

Eugene Paul Holzapfel

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 26 June 2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 12 July 2000.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted in 1998, govern aviation safety across Australia and are overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This legislation provides a comprehensive framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, including airworthiness directives that ensure aircraft and aeronautical products meet safety standards. One such directive, AD/JT9D/33, was introduced to address the potential risk of uncontained engine failure due to cracks in the diffuser cases of Pratt and Whitney JT9D Series turbine engines. This risk could lead to significant damage to the aircraft and potential safety hazards. The directive mandates inspections and necessary replacements of non-compliant diffuser cases, aligning with the technical requirements specified by the Federal Aviation Administration's Airworthiness Directive 93-19-02 R1 amendment 39-9038, to mitigate these risks. The directive was issued under the authority of CASA and became effective on 10 August 2000, as detailed in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 12 July 2000.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, mandate that Airworthiness Directives (AD) are issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure the safe operation of aircraft and aeronautical products. This legislation applies to Pratt and Whitney JT9D series turbine engines, which are installed on certain aircraft. The AD is intended to correct unsafe conditions that could potentially lead to engine failure and damage to the aircraft. The geographic reach of this regulation is national, as CASA is the governing body for civil aviation safety in Australia. The AD specifies that Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, -7, -7H, -7A, -7AH, -7F, -7J, -20 and -20J turbofan engines must comply with the directive by inspecting and replacing diffuser cases that do not meet the technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 93-19-02 R1 amendment 39-9038. Compliance with this directive is mandatory, with specific requirements and timeframes detailed in the AD. This directive became effective on 10 August 2000, and was published in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 12 July 2000.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this Airworthiness Directive (AD) under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) are detailed in the applicability, requirement, and compliance sections. The applicability section specifies that the AD applies to Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, -7, -7H, -7A, -7AH, -7F, -7J, -20, and -20J turbofan engines. The requirement section mandates that the diffuser cases of these engines must be inspected and replaced if they do not meet the technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 93-19-02 R1 amendment 39-9038. This inspection and replacement are necessary to address potential cracking in the diffuser cases, which could lead to uncontained engine failure and damage to the aircraft. The compliance section sets the directive in effect as of 10 August 2000, with a revised effective date detailed in the Requirement Document. The obligations imposed by this AD on the parties or entities it governs include ensuring that Pratt and Whitney JT9D-series turbofan engines are inspected and maintained according to the specified technical requirements. This involves inspecting the diffuser cases for any signs of cracking and replacing any diffuser cases that do not meet the required standards. The directive references specific FAA documents, including FAA AD 93-19-02 R1 amendment 39-9038, P&W Alert SB No 6076 R1, and P&W SB No 5591 R7 and 5591 R4, which provide further guidance on the inspection and replacement procedures. Additionally, the AD specifies that these actions must be carried out by a detailed compliance date, ensuring that the safety measures are implemented promptly and effectively. Any breach of the requirements set out in this AD may result in severe consequences. While the specific civil or criminal penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the text, it is evident that failure to adhere to the AD could lead to significant safety risks, including the potential for uncontained engine failure. Such outcomes could result in substantial damage to aircraft and endanger lives. Furthermore, non-compliance with civil aviation safety directives can lead to regulatory actions, including fines, suspension or revocation of airworthiness certificates, and other enforcement measures by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The directive underscores the critical importance of adhering to the specified safety protocols to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft and ensure the safety of all involved.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Airworthiness Directive

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.