AD/JT9D/32 - Combustion Chamber Outer Casing

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B11026 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 



Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE


For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.

 

AD/JT9D/32 Combustion Chamber Outer Casing 8/2000

Applicability: Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, -7, -7H, -7A, -7AH, -7F, -7J, -20 and -20J series turbofan engines.

 

Requirement:  Perform on-wing ultrasonic inspections of the Combustion Chamber Outer Casing (CCOC) forward flange (L-flange) fillet radius for cracking in accordance with the Technical Requirements of FAA AD 99-15-02 Amendment 39-11221.

 

Installation of a CCOC containing improved L-flange P/N 734515 or 056-1133-1 or installation of CCOC with P/N 758479 or CFL758479 constitutes terminating action to the repetitive inspection of FAA AD 99-15-02.

 

Note: FAA AD 99-15-02 Amendment 39-11221 refers.

 

Compliance:  Initial and repetitive inspections as specified in the Requirement document with a revised effective date of 10 August 2000.

 

This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 10 August 2000.

 

Background:  This Directive raised to mandate a repetitive inspection of the combustion chamber outer casing forward L flange fillet radius for cracking and replacing cracked L flange with serviceable parts. Such cracks could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the aircraft.


 

Eugene Paul Holzapfel

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 28 June 2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 12 July 2000.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, establishes a framework for the regulation of airworthiness directives aimed at ensuring the safety of aviation operations within Australia. Enacted to address the need for regular safety checks and maintenance of aircraft components, this legislation empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue mandatory directives that require corrective actions for identified safety issues. The primary objective of these regulations is to prevent unsafe conditions that could compromise the integrity and safety of aircraft in operation. This particular Airworthiness Directive, issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, targets Pratt and Whitney JT9D series turbofan engines. The directive mandates on-wing ultrasonic inspections of the combustion chamber outer casing forward flange fillet radius to detect potential cracks, a critical safety measure to prevent uncontained engine failure and subsequent damage to the aircraft. This directive was issued to ensure compliance with safety standards and to mitigate risks associated with engine malfunctions, thereby enhancing overall aviation safety.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, pertains to the Airworthiness Directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure the safety of aircraft and aeronautical products in Australian airspace. This particular Airworthiness Directive (AD) targets Pratt and Whitney JT9D series turbofan engines used in various aircraft, mandating on-wing ultrasonic inspections of the Combustion Chamber Outer Casing (CCOC) forward flange (L-flange) fillet radius for cracking, as outlined in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) AD 99-15-02 Amendment 39-11221. The directive applies to Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, -7, -7H, -7A, -7AH, -7F, -7J, -20 and -20J series turbofan engines installed in aircraft registered in Australia. The AD requires compliance with specific inspection and maintenance procedures to mitigate the risk of uncontained engine failure and subsequent damage to the aircraft. The directive became effective on 10 August 2000, with initial and repetitive inspections specified in the FAA AD 99-15-02 Amendment 39-11221.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) include the applicability, requirement, and compliance sections. The applicability section (a) specifies that the AD applies to Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, -7, -7H, -7A, -7AH, -7F, -7J, -20 and -20J series turbofan engines. The requirement section (b) mandates that on-wing ultrasonic inspections of the Combustion Chamber Outer Casing (CCOC) forward flange (L-flange) fillet radius for cracking must be performed in accordance with the Technical Requirements of FAA AD 99-15-02 Amendment 39-11221. The compliance section (c) specifies that the initial and repetitive inspections must be carried out with an effective date of 10 August 2000. The AD imposes obligations on the operators and maintainers of aircraft equipped with the specified Pratt and Whitney JT9D series engines. Specifically, they must ensure that the required inspections are conducted by appropriately trained and certified personnel, in line with the procedures outlined in FAA AD 99-15-02 Amendment 39-11221. Failure to comply with these inspection requirements may lead to the engine being deemed unairworthy, potentially resulting in grounding of the aircraft until the necessary inspections and repairs are completed. Breaches of the AD may result in serious consequences, including both civil and criminal penalties. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with an AD can lead to fines and imprisonment. The maximum penalty for an individual can be up to $126,000 and/or imprisonment for five years, while the maximum penalty for a body corporate can be up to $630,000. In addition to these penalties, non-compliance can also result in the suspension or revocation of an operator's certificate under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Act 1998, potentially leading to the cessation of flight operations. The safety of passengers and crew is paramount, and strict adherence to ADs is mandatory to ensure the continued airworthiness of aircraft.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.