AD/JT9D/26 - Diffuser Case Inspection

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B11019 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series

 

AD/JT9D/26 Diffuser Case Inspection 9/94

Applicability: Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7F engines.

 

Requirement:  Action in accordance with the requirements of FAA AD 93-19-02. Compliance: Effective 18 August 1994, as specified in the FAA AD.

Background: There have been reports of cracking in the diffuser case at the rear rail location.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended by the legislative instrument F2006B11019, address the specific issue of ensuring the airworthiness of Pratt and Whitney JT9D Series turbine engines, particularly focusing on the JT9D-7F engines. This legislative update was enacted to address reports of cracking in the diffuser case at the rear rail location, which could potentially compromise the safety of aircraft operations. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) introduced this regulation to mandate inspections and compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's Airworthiness Directive (FAA AD 93-19-02) to ensure that these engines meet safety standards and mitigate any risks associated with such structural issues. The objective is to maintain the highest safety standards in civil aviation by requiring timely and effective actions to be taken in response to identified defects in critical engine components.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, pertains to the Pratt and Whitney JT9D Series turbine engines, with a particular focus on the diffuser case inspection as outlined in AD/JT9D/26. This legislation applies to Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7F engines, mandating that they must adhere to the requirements set forth in FAA AD 93-19-02. The regulation was made effective as of 18 August 1994 and is designed to address concerns regarding reports of cracking in the diffuser case at the rear rail location, ensuring that these engines meet safety standards and comply with the specified action requirements. This regulation is a component of the broader framework managed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and extends its applicability across the Commonwealth of Australia, encompassing all relevant entities and industries operating within the Australian aviation sector.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, Section 106, outline the schedule of airworthiness directives for Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines of the JT9D series. This regulation includes AD/JT9D/26, which mandates the inspection of the diffuser case for Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7F engines. The directive aligns with the requirements outlined in FAA AD 93-19-02, and it became effective from 18 August 1994. The directive is prompted by reports of cracking in the diffuser case at the rear rail location. The primary obligation under this regulation is for the owners and operators of aircraft equipped with Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7F engines to ensure that the specified inspection of the diffuser case is performed. This inspection is critical to prevent any potential safety issues that could arise from the reported cracking at the rear rail location. The requirement is clear: adhere to the inspection protocol detailed in FAA AD 93-19-02. The directive ensures that all relevant inspections are conducted meticulously and that any identified issues are addressed promptly to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft. Failure to comply with the airworthiness directives set forth in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can lead to significant legal consequences. Operators who do not adhere to the required inspections and subsequent actions may face civil penalties, including fines. The specific penalties are detailed within the broader legislative framework governing civil aviation safety. Furthermore, non-compliance can result in the grounding of the aircraft until the required inspections are satisfactorily completed, which could disrupt operations and potentially lead to further financial repercussions. The regulation also encompasses potential criminal consequences for wilful or reckless non-compliance. Individuals or entities found guilty of deliberately ignoring the airworthiness directives may face criminal charges, which could include imprisonment. The severity of the penalties underscores the importance of adhering to the safety requirements set forth by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, ensuring that all aircraft maintain the highest standards of safety and reliability. This regulatory framework is designed to protect the public and maintain the integrity of the aviation industry.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Diffuser Case Inspection

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.