COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series
AD/JT9D/19
Amdt 2
Surge Margin Improvements 3/93
Applicability: JT9D-7R4D, E series engines installed in Boeing B767 aircraft.
Requirement: Action in accordance with FAA Airworthiness Directive 90-14-08, paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h) and (i).
For the purpose of this Directive, compliance with the requirements of PWA SB JT9D-7R4-75-101 is deemed to be an alternative method of compliance with the requirements of FAA AD 90-14-08, paragraph (d), (2).
Compliance: As detailed in the requirement document, with an effective date of 4 March 1993.
Background: This Directive has been amended to reflect the release of an additional procedure which, if incorporated, will improve the JT9D-7R4 surge margin.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically within Part 39, contain the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's schedule of airworthiness directives, which aim to ensure the safety and reliability of aircraft in operation. One such directive, AD/JT9D/19 Amendment 2, addresses surge margin improvements for Pratt and Whitney JT9D series turbine engines installed in Boeing B767 aircraft. This directive was introduced to tackle the problem of insufficient surge margins in these engines, which could potentially lead to engine failure or catastrophic incidents. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority mandates compliance with this directive, aligning with the Federal Aviation Administration's Airworthiness Directive 90-14-08 and an alternative compliance method through Pratt and Whitney's service bulletin. The directive was enacted to enhance the safety and operational integrity of the affected aircraft by ensuring that the engines meet specified performance and safety standards.
The enactment of this airworthiness directive by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority reflects the policy objective of maintaining high safety standards in the Australian civil aviation sector. This objective aligns with the broader goal of preventing aviation accidents and incidents, thereby protecting the lives of passengers and crew, as well as ensuring the reliability and safety of air travel. The directive is a response to recognised safety issues with specific engine models and aims to standardise corrective actions to mitigate these risks effectively. The directive was introduced to ensure that the Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7R4D, E series engines installed in Boeing B767 aircraft operate within safe parameters, thereby enhancing overall aviation safety.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, which are legally binding requirements designed to ensure the safe operation of aircraft. The particular directive under discussion, AD/JT9D/19 Amendment 2, addresses surge margin improvements for Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines of the JT9D series, specifically models JT9D-7R4D and E, installed in Boeing B767 aircraft. This directive is applicable to all aircraft operators who maintain or use the specified engines, ensuring that safety standards are met through compliance with FAA Airworthiness Directive 90-14-08. The directive mandates actions that align with the FAA directive's specified paragraphs, and compliance is deemed to be achieved if Pratt and Whitney's Service Bulletin JT9D-7R4-75-101 is followed as an alternative method to meet certain requirements. The directive came into effect on 4 March 1993, with subsequent amendments reflecting improvements in the JT9D-7R4 surge margin.
Key Provisions
The Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series Airworthiness Directive (AD/JT9D/19) Amendment 2, specifically AD/JT9D/19 Amendment 2, concerns the JT9D-7R4D, E series engines installed in Boeing B767 aircraft. This legislative instrument requires compliance with FAA Airworthiness Directive 90-14-08, addressing surge margin improvements for these engines. Section 39-106 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 mandates that the action be taken in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (i) of the FAA directive. Specifically, compliance with PWA Service Bulletin JT9D-7R4-75-101 is considered an acceptable alternative to FAA AD 90-14-08, paragraph (d), (2). The directive took effect on 4 March 1993, and its applicability is limited to the specified JT9D-7R4D, E series engines in Boeing B767 aircraft.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives imposes specific obligations on the parties involved, including aircraft operators, maintenance organisations, and manufacturers. The primary obligation is to ensure that the specified engines are inspected and modified as required by the directive to maintain airworthiness. This includes adhering to the detailed requirements outlined in the FAA AD 90-14-08 and the alternative compliance method via PWA SB JT9D-7R4-75-101. Additionally, it is necessary to document all actions taken to comply with the directive and retain these records for future reference and regulatory review.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Airworthiness Directive can result in severe consequences. Section 91.303 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 stipulates that non-compliance with airworthiness directives is an offence. The potential penalties for breaching these regulations include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach. The exact penalties are not specified in the directive but are governed by the broader aviation regulations, which can impose significant financial and custodial penalties for non-compliance. It is crucial for all parties involved to adhere to the directive to avoid these serious repercussions.