COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series
AD/JT9D/14
Amdt 1
Diffuser Case Rear Rail Cracking 6/93
Applicability: JT9D-7, 7A, -7H, -7AH, -7F, -7J.
Requirement: Inspect the diffuser case rear rail for cracking in accordance with Pratt and Whitney Service Bulletin 5591 Revision 7.
Note: FAA AD 86-11-04 refers.
Compliance: Effective 27 May 1993: As detailed in the requirement document.
Background: This Directive has been amended to reflect the manufacturer's latest revision to the requirement document. The revision, in part, introduces a new Eddy Current Inspection (ECI) probe and reduced inspection intervals for diffuser cases with weld repairs in certain locations and various crack lengths.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, provide a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft operating in Australian airspace. Among these regulations is the Airworthiness Directive AD/JT9D/14 Amendment 1, which was introduced in 1993 to address specific safety concerns associated with Pratt and Whitney JT9D Series turbine engines, particularly focusing on diffuser case rear rail cracking. This amendment was enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The policy objective behind this directive is to mandate regular inspections and maintenance to prevent potential in-flight failures, thereby enhancing overall aviation safety. Compliance with this directive is crucial for maintaining the airworthiness of affected aircraft and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 106, apply to all persons involved in the operation, maintenance, and repair of Pratt and Whitney JT9D series turbine engines, which include models JT9D-7, 7A, -7H, -7AH, -7F, and -7J. This regulation is enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and has a national jurisdictional reach, affecting all aviation entities operating within Australia. The primary purpose of this regulation is to ensure the safety of air travel by mandating specific inspections of diffuser case rear rails for cracking. Compliance with these directives is mandatory and requires adherence to the inspection procedures outlined in Pratt and Whitney Service Bulletin 5591 Revision 7. The regulations include amendments to address new inspection techniques, such as the introduction of Eddy Current Inspection (ECI) probes, and adjustments to inspection intervals based on the location and length of weld repairs. This ensures that the inspection protocols are both comprehensive and up to date with industry standards, ultimately aiming to prevent potential safety hazards related to engine failure.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, Part 39, Section 106, specifically the Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, includes the Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT9D Series AD/JT9D/14 Amendment 1, which pertains to diffuser case rear rail cracking. The applicability of this directive covers JT9D-7, 7A, -7H, -7AH, -7F, and -7J series engines (Section 6/93). The primary requirement is that operators must inspect the diffuser case rear rail for cracking, following the guidelines outlined in Pratt and Whitney Service Bulletin 5591, Revision 7 (Section 6/93). This directive references FAA AD 86-11-04 for additional context and compliance standards (Section 6/93).
This Act imposes specific obligations on the operators of the aforementioned engine models. Operators are required to ensure that the inspections are conducted by qualified personnel and in accordance with the manufacturer's detailed instructions. The compliance with this directive is effective from 27 May 1993, and adherence to the outlined inspection protocols is mandatory to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft (Section 6/93). Operators must also keep records of all inspections and any necessary repairs or replacements made, ensuring traceability and accountability for each aircraft (Section 6/93).
The directive underscores the importance of compliance by outlining potential consequences for non-adherence. Any operator failing to comply with the airworthiness directive risks facing significant penalties. The potential civil and criminal consequences include fines and possible legal actions against the operator or the aircraft owner. The specific maximum penalties are not explicitly stated in the directive but would typically be aligned with the broader regulatory framework under which the Civil Aviation Regulations operate. Non-compliance could also result in grounding of the affected aircraft until the necessary inspections and repairs are satisfactorily completed (Section 6/93).