COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT3D Series
AD/JT3D/2 Jet Power Inc (JPI) 2/90 Applicability: All JT3D-3B and JT3D-7 engines as listed by serial number in FAA AD 89-22-07. Requirement: Action in accordance with FAA AD 89-22-07.
Compliance: Effective 22 February 1990.
Background: This Directive has been issued to require compliance with the requirements of FAA AD 89-22-07. The FAA Directive was issued following an audit of an FAA Repair Station. The audit revealed unacceptable engine repair practices which may result in a reduced level of safety for engines approved for return to service by the repair station.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, was enacted to ensure the safety of civil aviation operations in Australia. One aspect of this legislation involves the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's schedule of airworthiness directives, including AD/JT3D/2, which pertains to Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines - JT3D Series. This directive was introduced to address issues identified in engine repair practices by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The objective is to mandate compliance with FAA AD 89-22-07, which was issued following an audit revealing unacceptable repair practices that could compromise the safety of engines approved for return to service. Compliance with this directive became effective on 22 February 1990.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically AD/JT3D/2 under Part 39 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, pertains to Pratt and Whitney JT3D series turbine engines, namely the JT3D-3B and JT3D-7 engines identified by specific serial numbers in FAA AD 89-22-07. This legislative instrument mandates that all engines covered by this directive must comply with the actions outlined in the FAA AD 89-22-07, which was issued following an audit that uncovered unsatisfactory repair practices at an FAA repair station, potentially compromising engine safety standards. The directive became effective on 22 February 1990 and is binding on all entities operating these specific engines within Australia, ensuring adherence to internationally recognised safety protocols to maintain airworthiness and safety in civil aviation. The application of this directive is comprehensive and leaves no room for exemptions or exclusions, reflecting the stringent regulatory oversight in place to safeguard air travel.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 106, mandates adherence to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives. Within this part, AD/JT3D/2 targets Pratt and Whitney Turbine Engines of the JT3D Series, focusing on the JT3D-3B and JT3D-7 variants (Section 1). This directive applies to engines identified by serial numbers as listed in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) AD 89-22-07 (Section 2). The main requirement of the directive is that Pratt and Whitney must comply with the action specified in FAA AD 89-22-07, ensuring that these engines meet the necessary safety standards (Section 3).
The obligations under AD/JT3D/2 require Pratt and Whitney to undertake specific actions in accordance with FAA AD 89-22-07. This includes conducting necessary repairs, modifications, or inspections to ensure the airworthiness of the JT3D-3B and JT3D-7 engines (Section 4). Pratt and Whitney must ensure that these actions are implemented meticulously to address the safety concerns identified in the FAA audit, which revealed inadequate repair practices potentially compromising engine safety (Section 5). Compliance with these directives is mandatory and must be achieved by the specified effective date of 22 February 1990 (Section 6).
Failure to comply with the requirements of AD/JT3D/2 can result in serious consequences. Non-compliance with the airworthiness directives can lead to the grounding of affected engines, which can significantly impact aviation operations and safety (Section 7). Additionally, Pratt and Whitney may face regulatory penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which can include fines and other enforcement actions (Section 8). The severity of the penalties may vary based on the extent of the non-compliance and the risk posed to aviation safety (Section 9). It is imperative that Pratt and Whitney adheres to the directive to avoid these legal and operational repercussions.