AD/INST/47 Amdt 1 - KC 225 AFCS

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B10851 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 


AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/INST/47 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.

 

Instruments and Automatic Pilots

 

AD/INST/47

Amdt 1


KC 225 AFCS 8/2001

DM

 

 

Applicability:  Honeywell KC 225 Automatic Flight Control Systems (AFCS) with the following Part Numbers:

 

065-00183-0101

065-00183-0501

065-00183-2701

065-00183-0201

065-00183-0601

065-00183-2801

065-00183-0301

065-00183-2501

065-00183-2901

065-00183-0401

065-00183-2601

065-00183-3001

 

Note 1: KC 225 AFCS are known to be fitted to, but not limited to, the following aeroplanes:

 

Manufacturer Models

 

Aerostar Aircraft Corporation PA-60-700P (Aerostar 700P) The Cessna Aircraft Company              208 and 208B

Commander Aircraft Corporation (Rockwell)


114B and 114TC

 

Mooney Aircraft Corporation M20M and M20R

 

The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. PA-34-220T and PA-46-350P

 

Raytheon Aircraft Company (Beech)


58, 95-55, 95-C55, A36, B36TC, D55, and E55

 

SOCATA - Groupe Aerospatiale TB20 and TB21

 

Instruments and Automatic Pilots

 

AD/INST/47 Amdt 1 (Continued)

 

Requirement: 1. Inspect the KC 225 AFCS in accordance with Honeywell Installation Bulletin (IB) 472 Alert, Revision 1, dated January 2001, to determine the currently installed computer modifications (Mods).

 

2.        If the Requirement 1 inspection determines that only Mods 1 and/or 2 are incorporated, accomplish the following in accordance with IB 472 Alert, Revision 1:

 

  1. Deactivate the KC 225 AFCS by pulling and banding the autopilot circuit breaker(s) to prevent operation of the KC 225 AFCS in flight; and

 

b.        Fabricate a placard that indicates the KC 225 AFCS is inoperative and install this placard on the instrument panel within the pilot’s clear view. The placard should use letters of at least 2.5 mm (0.10 inches) in height and contain the following words:

 

"KC 225 AFCS INOPERATIVE"

 

An optional alternative to the deactivation of the AFCS with only Mods 1 and/or 2 installed is to either:

 

Return the AFCS to the Honeywell Service Center for modification to install Mod 1, 2 and 3 (or higher); or

 

Contact Honeywell Product Support for a warranty replacement KC 225 AFCS that contains Mod 1, 2 and 3 (or higher) levels.

 

Note 2: If either of the optional alternates is adopted, the AFCS must remain deactivated and placarded in accordance with Requirement 2 until an AFCS unit with at least Mods 1, 2 and 3 is installed.

 

3.        If the Requirement 1 inspection determines that no Mods are installed or at least Mods 1, 2, and 3 are installed, ensure that the aircraft records identify AFCS Mod status in accordance with IB 472 Alert, Revision 1. This Directive requires no further action.

 

Note 3: FAA AD 2001-10-09 Amdt 39-12235 refers.

 

Compliance:  For Requirement 1 - Remains unchanged as ‘Within the next 10 hours time-in-service after the effective date of the original issue of the Directive’.

 

For Requirement 2 - Remains unchanged as ‘Before further flight after the Requirement 1 inspection’.

 

For Requirement 3 - Remains unchanged as ‘Before further flight after the Requirement 1 inspection’.

 

Instruments and Automatic Pilots

 

AD/INST/47 Amdt 1 (Continued)

 

This Amendment becomes effective on 27 June 2001.

 

Background:  This original issue of this Directive required inspection of KC 225 AFCS to determine the computer modification status, deactivation of any units with only Mods 1 and/or 2 incorporated, and the installation of an appropriate placard if the unit is deactivated/inoperative. The original issue also provided, as an alternative method of compliance, the option of installing a unit that incorporated Mod 3 or higher.

 

The original issue of the Directive was issued as a result of several reports that the AFCS was disconnecting without warning in a gross mistrim configuration. The actions specified by the Directive were intended to prevent an undesirable autotrim command that the autopilot cannot detect in the required time, which could result in the aeroplane deviating from the selected altitude, or the autopilot could disconnect without warning. This in turn could result in heavy loads at the control column and such loads in the pitch axis could result in loss of control of the aeroplane.

 

This amendment is issued to correct the title of the Directive.

 

The original issue of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 15 June 2001.


 

Eugene Paul Holzapfel

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 20 June 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 27 June 2001.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) enacted the Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/INST/47 Amendment 1 in 2001 to address safety concerns related to the Honeywell KC 225 Automatic Flight Control Systems (AFCS) in specific aircraft models. This AD was issued in response to multiple reports of the AFCS disconnecting without warning, which could lead to a gross mistrim configuration, potentially resulting in loss of control of the aeroplane. The directive aims to ensure the safe operation of affected aircraft by requiring inspections, deactivation of certain AFCS units, and the installation of appropriate placards to notify pilots of inoperative systems. The AD was introduced under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, and the compliance requirements are outlined to be completed within specified timeframes following the directive's issuance.

Scope and Application

The Airworthiness Directive issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) applies specifically to Honeywell KC 225 Automatic Flight Control Systems (AFCS) with particular Part Numbers installed in certain aircraft models. This includes aircraft manufactured by entities such as Aerostar Aircraft Corporation, The Cessna Aircraft Company, Commander Aircraft Corporation, Mooney Aircraft Corporation, The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., Raytheon Aircraft Company, and SOCATA - Groupe Aerospatiale. The directive mandates actions to ensure the safe operation of these systems by requiring inspections, deactivations, and placarding of AFCS units that do not meet specified modification levels. The directive applies nationally across the Commonwealth of Australia and is enforced by CASA, which is the regulatory body under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The directive does not exclude any entities or aircraft from its scope and requires compliance within specified timeframes. Additionally, the directive may be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, which may provide further guidance or modifications to the requirements and compliance timelines.

Key Provisions

The Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/INST/47 Amdt 1 pertains to specific Honeywell KC 225 Automatic Flight Control Systems (AFCS) installed on various aircraft models. The directive requires inspections to determine the computer modification status of the AFCS and mandates actions based on the findings. For instance, if the inspection reveals that only modifications 1 and/or 2 are incorporated, the AFCS must be deactivated by pulling and banding the autopilot circuit breaker(s) to prevent its operation in flight. Additionally, a placard indicating "KC 225 AFCS INOPERATIVE" must be fabricated and installed in the pilot's clear view on the instrument panel. Alternatively, the AFCS can be returned to the Honeywell Service Center for modification or replaced with a unit that includes modifications 1, 2, and 3 or higher. If the inspection shows that no modifications or at least modifications 1, 2, and 3 are installed, no further action is required, but the aircraft records must identify the AFCS modification status. The AD imposes specific obligations on aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance personnel. Aircraft owners and operators must ensure that the KC 225 AFCS on their aircraft is inspected within the next 10 hours of time-in-service after the directive's effective date. Following the inspection, if the AFCS is found to have only modifications 1 and/or 2, it must be deactivated before any further flight, and the appropriate placard must be installed. If an alternative compliance method is chosen, the AFCS must remain deactivated until a unit with at least modifications 1, 2, and 3 is installed. Maintenance personnel must perform the inspections and any required modifications or replacements in accordance with Honeywell Installation Bulletin (IB) 472 Alert, Revision 1. Breach of the AD can lead to serious consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) enforces compliance with the directive, and failure to adhere to the specified requirements can result in penalties. Non-compliance could potentially lead to unsafe aircraft operations, which could in turn result in accidents or incidents. While the AD itself does not specify maximum penalties for non-compliance, CASA has the authority to take enforcement actions, including fines and potential criminal charges in severe cases, against individuals or entities that fail to comply with airworthiness directives. Compliance is crucial to ensure the continued safe operation of the affected aircraft.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.