COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Instruments and Automatic Pilots
AD/INST/3
3 Amdt 1
King KAP/KFC 200 Autopilot 1/89
Applicability: King KC 295 computer (part of KAP/KFC 200 autopilot system).
Requirement: Action in accordance with King-Bendix SB KC 295 Adapter Alert Mod 8. (KPN 600- 2428-08).
Compliance: Before 31 October 1989.
Background: To allow the system to detect a malfunctioning autotrim sense switch. This AD has been revised to remove any confusion with the SB reference.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, were enacted to ensure the safety of civil aviation in Australia. This legislation encompasses a range of regulatory requirements to maintain and enhance airworthiness standards, among other things. One such legislative instrument is AD/INST/33 Amendment 1, which pertains to the King KAP/KFC 200 Autopilot, specifically targeting the King KC 295 computer as part of the autopilot system. This amendment was introduced to address the need for an improved detection system for a malfunctioning autotrim sense switch, ensuring that the autopilot system can function reliably and safely. The policy objective is to prevent potential hazards arising from such malfunctions by mandating compliance with the King-Bendix Service Bulletin KC 295 Adapter Alert Modification 8, ensuring all affected systems are updated and functional by the specified deadline.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under PART 39 - 107, mandate the Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s Schedule of Airworthiness Directives which applies to the maintenance and operation of aircraft within the Commonwealth of Australia. This particular legislative instrument, AD/INST/33 Amendment 1, pertains to the King KAP/KFC 200 autopilot system and mandates compliance with the King-Bendix Service Bulletin KC 295 Adapter Alert Modification 8. This directive applies to the King KC 295 computer, a component integral to the KAP/KFC 200 autopilot system. It requires corrective actions to ensure the system can accurately detect a malfunctioning autotrim sense switch, enhancing the safety and reliability of the aircraft. The directive imposes a compliance deadline of 31 October 1989, underscoring the urgency and importance of adhering to these safety measures. The legislation extends its reach across all aircraft falling under the purview of the Civil Aviation Regulations within Australia, thereby affecting aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance service providers. The application of this Act is not restricted by geographic or jurisdictional boundaries within the Commonwealth, ensuring uniform compliance across all states and territories.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, outlines several directives aimed at ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft. In this context, AD/INST/33 Amendment 1 pertains to the King KAP/KFC 200 Autopilot system, more precisely the King KC 295 computer, which is a part of this autopilot system (section 1). The directive mandates compliance with King-Bendix Service Bulletin KC 295 Adapter Alert Mod 8 (KPN 600-2428-08), which is intended to enhance the system's ability to detect a malfunctioning autotrim sense switch (section 1). Compliance with this directive must be achieved before 31 October 1989 (section 1).
The Act imposes specific obligations on the parties governed by these regulations. Owners or operators of aircraft equipped with the King KAP/KFC 200 Autopilot system must ensure that the KC 295 computer is modified in accordance with the King-Bendix Service Bulletin KC 295 Adapter Alert Mod 8. This modification is essential to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft and to comply with the safety standards set forth in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998. Failure to comply with this directive can result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which could lead to operational restrictions or prohibitions.
Violation of the provisions set out in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can lead to significant consequences. If an aircraft does not comply with the requirements stipulated in AD/INST/33 Amendment 1, it may be subject to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This could include fines, enforcement notices, or even grounding of the aircraft. The maximum penalties for such breaches are not explicitly stated in the provided text, but they can be severe, reflecting the critical importance of adhering to these safety directives. Ensuring compliance not only safeguards the aircraft's airworthiness but also protects the safety of passengers, crew, and the general public.