COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Instruments and Automatic Pilots
AD/INST/21 King KFC200 - IAFCS - Bridle Cable Clamps - Inspection
Applicability: All King KFC200 IAFCS. Document: King Installation Bulletin 101.
Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 31 August 1976.
8/76
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, includes Airworthiness Directives that govern the maintenance and safety standards for aircraft within Australia. One such directive is AD/INST/21, which pertains to the inspection of bridle cable clamps for King KFC200 Instrument Approach and Flight Control Systems (IAFCS). This directive was enacted to address the need for regular inspection and maintenance of critical components in aircraft systems to ensure continued airworthiness and safety in accordance with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s (CASA) regulations. The Australian Government, through the enactment of this legislative instrument, aims to maintain high standards of safety and operational integrity within the civil aviation industry by ensuring that specific components such as bridle cable clamps are inspected and maintained according to the prescribed timelines and procedures. This legislative instrument is a means to enforce compliance with the set safety standards and to mitigate potential risks associated with the operation of King KFC200 IAFCS in Australian airspace.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39, applies to all aircraft and aviation-related entities that are subject to the jurisdiction of the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This includes aircraft manufacturers, operators, maintenance organisations, and any other entities involved in the maintenance, operation, or manufacture of aircraft components within Australia. The geographic reach of these regulations is national, ensuring that all aviation activities and components meet stringent safety standards across the Commonwealth. The Act mandates that all King KFC200 IAFCS must comply with the inspection requirements for bridle cable clamps as outlined in the Airworthiness Directive AD/INST/21. This compliance must be achieved within 100 hours of time in service after the specified date of 31 August 1976, as referenced in King Installation Bulletin 101. The regulations do not specify any exclusions or exemptions for these directives, thereby ensuring a uniform application to all applicable aircraft and aviation components within the national airspace. Additionally, the Act provides for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, allowing for further clarification or adjustment of compliance requirements as necessary.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly AD/INST/21, mandate that all King KFC200 Instrument Approach Flight Control Systems (IAFCS) must comply with specific inspection requirements for the bridle cable clamps. This directive, encapsulated in the King Installation Bulletin 101, applies to all King KFC200 IAFCS systems installed in aircraft. The regulation necessitates that these inspections be carried out within 100 hours of time in service following the directive's issuance date of 31 August 1976.
In line with these regulations, the obligations imposed on the parties or entities governed by these directives include conducting a thorough inspection of the bridle cable clamps on the King KFC200 IAFCS systems. Operators and owners of aircraft equipped with these systems are required to ensure that the inspection is performed by qualified personnel and documented appropriately. Failure to comply with these inspection requirements could potentially lead to safety issues, making it imperative for operators to adhere strictly to the stipulated timelines and standards.
Should there be a breach of these obligations, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may take enforcement action. The potential consequences of non-compliance can include both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties could involve fines and other monetary sanctions, while criminal penalties might encompass imprisonment or additional fines, depending on the severity of the breach and its impact on aviation safety. The exact penalties are determined by CASA based on the specific circumstances of each case, but they are intended to be sufficient to enforce compliance and deter future violations.