AD/HU 369/54 - Governor Lever Control Rod - Replacement

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B10717 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters

 

AD/HU 369/54 Governor Lever Control Rod - Replacement 3/82

Applicability: All models.

 

Requirement: Remove P/N 369A7706-3 RPM Governor Lever Control Rod and replace with P/N 369A7706-5 RPM Governor Lever Control Rod.

 

Note: FAA AD 82-01-18, Amendment 39-4292, Hughes SIN No. DN-87 and SIN No. HN-169 also refer to this subject.

 

Compliance: Within 25 hours time in service after 25 January 1982.

 

Background: Failure of the aluminium control rod will result in loss of engine power control. The replacement rod is fabricated from steel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as part of the broader legislative framework managed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), address various aspects of aviation safety, including the issuance of airworthiness directives. One such directive, AD/HU 369/54, was introduced to address a specific safety issue with the McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters. This directive mandates the replacement of the RPM Governor Lever Control Rod to prevent potential failures that could result in loss of engine power control. The directive was enacted to ensure that all models of these helicopters comply with the updated safety standards within 25 hours of time in service after 25 January 1982. The policy objective behind this directive is to enhance the safety and reliability of these helicopters by replacing the aluminium control rod, which was prone to failure, with a steel counterpart. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Parliament, aim to maintain and enhance the safety of civil aviation in Australia. This particular airworthiness directive is an example of how CASA implements specific measures to address identified safety risks. The replacement of the control rod is crucial to prevent potential engine power failures, thereby maintaining the safety standards required in civil aviation operations. Compliance with this directive is mandatory, and adherence to the specified timeline ensures that the aviation industry continues to operate within the highest safety parameters.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under PART 39 - 105 and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, govern the maintenance and safety standards for civil aviation in Australia. This regulation applies to all operators of McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters, ensuring that these aircraft meet the necessary safety standards to operate within Australian airspace. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this regulation is national, as it is issued by the Commonwealth of Australia and CASA, which holds overarching authority over civil aviation safety. The directive requires the replacement of the P/N 369A7706-3 RPM Governor Lever Control Rod with P/N 369A7706-5, a critical change aimed at preventing the failure of the control rod which could lead to a loss of engine power control. Compliance with this directive must be achieved within 25 hours of time in service after 25 January 1982, ensuring that all affected aircraft are promptly updated to meet the required safety standards. This regulation extends its application through references to FAA AD 82-01-18, Amendment 39-4292, Hughes SIN No. DN-87, and SIN No. HN-169, indicating that compliance is not limited to Australian regulations but also includes international standards and directives.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, contain Airworthiness Directives (AD) that mandate certain actions to ensure the safety of aircraft. One such directive, AD/HU 369/54, pertains to the McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters, requiring the replacement of the P/N 369A7706-3 RPM Governor Lever Control Rod with P/N 369A7706-5 RPM Governor Lever Control Rod (section 105). This directive applies to all models of the specified helicopters (section 3/82). The requirement is straightforward: operators must remove the old control rod and replace it with the new one within 25 hours of the helicopter's time in service following 25 January 1982. This directive is cross-referenced with FAA AD 82-01-18, Amendment 39-4292, Hughes SIN No. DN-87 and SIN No. HN-169, indicating its importance and the collaborative nature of its implementation (section 3/82). The obligations imposed by AD/HU 369/54 on the operators and owners of the McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters are quite clear. They must ensure that the specified replacement of the Governor Lever Control Rod is carried out within the stipulated timeframe. This involves removing the existing control rod and installing the new one as directed. Compliance with this directive is critical to maintaining the airworthiness of the helicopters and ensuring the safety of all on board. Failure to adhere to the requirements could result in significant safety risks, including the potential loss of engine power control, which could lead to catastrophic outcomes. Breaching the requirements set forth in AD/HU 369/54 can have serious consequences. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 do not explicitly detail the penalties for non-compliance in this specific directive, but generally, violations of airworthiness directives can lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). These actions could include fines, grounding of the aircraft, or even more severe penalties if the non-compliance results in an accident or incident. Ensuring adherence to these directives is not only a legal obligation but also a matter of safety, underscoring the importance of prompt and proper compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.