COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters
AD/HU 369/45 Tail Rotor Swashplate Bearing Locknut - Increase in Torque
Applicability: All models 369H series helicopters. Document: Hughes SIN No. HN-150.
Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 31 March 1980.
3/80
Background: To prevent loosening of the tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut and possible loss of tail rotor control, the tightening torque of the locknut is increased.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, amended in 2006, aim to address the issue of potential tail rotor control loss in McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters by increasing the torque of the tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut. This legislative instrument was enacted to enhance the safety and reliability of civil aviation operations by ensuring that all models within the 369H series adhere to the specified maintenance requirements. The policy objective of this directive is to mitigate the risk of tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut loosening, which could lead to loss of control over the tail rotor and subsequently compromise the safety of the aircraft. The Australian Parliament, through the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, introduced this regulation to standardise safety practices and ensure compliance within the industry.
The legislative instrument, identified as AD/HU 369/45, mandates compliance within 100 hours of time in service after 31 March 1980 for helicopters with Hughes SIN No. HN-150. This directive is part of a broader regulatory framework aimed at maintaining high safety standards in civil aviation. By specifying the increased torque for the tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut, the regulation seeks to prevent mechanical failures that could have catastrophic consequences during flight operations.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, pertains to airworthiness directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. One such directive, AD/HU 369/45, applies to all models of the McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 series helicopters, with a Hughes SIN No. HN-150. This directive mandates an increase in the torque of the tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut to prevent its loosening and potential loss of tail rotor control. Compliance with this directive is required within 100 hours of time in service after 31 March 1980. This regulation is applicable nationally and is enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority to ensure the safety of civil aviation operations within Australia. The directive does not explicitly mention any exclusions or exemptions, thus applying broadly to all specified helicopters within the jurisdiction.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of this Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 document are outlined in PART 39 - 105, which provides specific airworthiness directives for certain aircraft models. In this case, the focus is on McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters, and the directive is AD/HU 369/45. This directive specifically addresses the tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut and mandates an increase in the torque (sections 39-105). The directive applies to all models within the 369H series helicopters, as identified by Hughes SIN No. HN-150, and requires compliance within 100 hours of time in service after 31 March 1980.
The obligations imposed by this directive are clear and straightforward. Operators of the specified helicopters must ensure that the torque of the tail rotor swashplate bearing locknut is increased as specified in the directive. This is to prevent the potential risk of the locknut loosening, which could lead to a loss of tail rotor control. Compliance with this directive is mandatory and must be achieved within the stipulated timeframe to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this airworthiness directive can result in serious consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to take enforcement actions against operators who do not adhere to these directives. While the specific civil or criminal penalties are not detailed in this particular directive, non-compliance with CASA directives can generally result in penalties including fines, suspension or revocation of aircraft certificates, and potential legal action against the operator. The seriousness of these penalties underscores the importance of adhering to the directive to ensure the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft.