AD/HU 369/43 - Main Rotor Blade Root Fitting Assemblies and Lead-Lag Assemblies - Inspection

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B10705 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters

 

AD/HU 369/43 Main Rotor Blade Root Fitting Assemblies

and Lead-Lag Assemblies - Inspection


2/80

 

Applicability: All model 369H with component S/Nos. as listed in the requirement document. Document:               Hughes SIN No. HN-140.

Compliance: Part 1 - Initial Inspection - within 25 hours time in service after 3 January 1980.

 

Part 2 - Periodic Inspection - as detailed in requirement document.

 

Background: Cracking of the main rotor hub lead-lag link attach lugs has been reported in service.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, aim to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation in Australia. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 of these regulations addresses airworthiness directives, which are crucial in maintaining the safety standards of aircraft. One such directive, AD/HU 369/43, pertains to the McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters, focusing on the inspection of main rotor blade root fittings and lead-lag assemblies. This directive was introduced to address the problem of reported cracking in the main rotor hub lead-lag link attach lugs, which posed a significant safety risk. The policy objective behind this regulation is to ensure that all affected helicopters are inspected at appropriate intervals to prevent potential failures and ensure continued airworthiness.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/HU 369/43 pertains to specific McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series helicopters, specifically those with Hughes SIN No. HN-140, and applies to the inspection of main rotor blade root fittings and lead-lag assemblies. This directive is designed to address the issue of cracking in the main rotor hub lead-lag link attach lugs, which has been reported in service, thus ensuring the continued airworthiness and safety of the affected helicopters. The AD mandates an initial inspection within 25 hours of time in service after 3 January 1980, followed by periodic inspections as specified in the requirement document. The directive applies at the Commonwealth level, extending its jurisdictional reach across Australia to ensure uniform compliance with safety standards. The AD does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond the outlined applicability, and its requirements may be further detailed or extended through subordinate instruments as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105, detail the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives for the McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters, with particular focus on the AD/HU 369/43 directive concerning Main Rotor Blade Root Fitting Assemblies and Lead-Lag Assemblies. Section 39.105 mandates that all model 369H helicopters with specific component serial numbers, as listed in the requirement document Hughes SIN No. HN-140, must comply with the inspection requirements outlined in the directive. The directive requires an initial inspection within 25 hours of time in service after 3 January 1980, followed by periodic inspections as detailed in the requirement document. These provisions impose a clear and stringent set of obligations on helicopter operators and maintenance personnel. Operators must ensure that the specified model 369H helicopters undergo the initial inspection within the stipulated timeframe. Following this, they must adhere to the periodic inspection schedule outlined in the requirement document to maintain compliance. This includes ensuring that the inspections are carried out by qualified personnel and that any identified issues are rectified in accordance with the regulatory standards set forth by CASA. Failure to comply with the requirements of AD/HU 369/43 can lead to serious consequences. The regulations do not explicitly state the penalties for non-compliance, but non-compliance with CASA directives can result in severe civil or criminal penalties under broader aviation safety laws. These can include fines, suspension or revocation of aircraft operating certificates, and potential criminal charges if the non-compliance leads to safety incidents or accidents. The seriousness of these potential outcomes underscores the importance of adhering to the specified inspection requirements to ensure the continued airworthiness and safety of the aircraft involved.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.